» Articles » PMID: 20890293

Categorical Speech Representation in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus

Overview
Journal Nat Neurosci
Date 2010 Oct 5
PMID 20890293
Citations 261
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Speech perception requires the rapid and effortless extraction of meaningful phonetic information from a highly variable acoustic signal. A powerful example of this phenomenon is categorical speech perception, in which a continuum of acoustically varying sounds is transformed into perceptually distinct phoneme categories. We found that the neural representation of speech sounds is categorically organized in the human posterior superior temporal gyrus. Using intracranial high-density cortical surface arrays, we found that listening to synthesized speech stimuli varying in small and acoustically equal steps evoked distinct and invariant cortical population response patterns that were organized by their sensitivities to critical acoustic features. Phonetic category boundaries were similar between neurometric and psychometric functions. Although speech-sound responses were distributed, spatially discrete cortical loci were found to underlie specific phonetic discrimination. Our results provide direct evidence for acoustic-to-higher order phonetic level encoding of speech sounds in human language receptive cortex.

Citing Articles

Expectation-driven sensory adaptations support enhanced acuity during categorical perception.

Sainburg T, McPherson T, Arneodo E, Rudraraju S, Turvey M, Theilman B Nat Neurosci. 2025; .

PMID: 40082615 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-025-01899-1.


The structural covariance of reading-related brain regions in adults and children with typical or poor reading skills.

Haugg A, Frei N, Lutz C, Di Pietro S, Karipidis I, Brem S Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025; 72:101522.

PMID: 39983518 PMC: 11889628. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101522.


Neuroimaging Findings for the Overnight Consolidation of Learned Non-native Speech Sounds.

Earle F, Molfese P, Myers E Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2025; 6.

PMID: 39830070 PMC: 11740156. DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00157.


Classification of ROI-based fMRI data in short-term memory tasks using discriminant analysis and neural networks.

Fafrowicz M, Tutajewski M, Sieradzki I, Ochab J, Ceglarek-Sroka A, Lewandowska K Front Neuroinform. 2025; 18:1480366.

PMID: 39759761 PMC: 11695337. DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2024.1480366.


Neural correlates of phonetic categorization under auditory (phoneme) and visual (grapheme) modalities.

Bidelman G, York A, Pearson C Neuroscience. 2024; 565:182-191.

PMID: 39631659 PMC: 11700760. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.11.079.


References
1.
Jancke L, Wustenberg T, Scheich H, Heinze H . Phonetic perception and the temporal cortex. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(4):733-46. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1027. View

2.
Liberman A, Mattingly I . A specialization for speech perception. Science. 1989; 243(4890):489-94. DOI: 10.1126/science.2643163. View

3.
Iverson P, Kuhl P . Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995; 97(1):553-62. DOI: 10.1121/1.412280. View

4.
Crone N, Boatman D, Gordon B, Hao L . Induced electrocorticographic gamma activity during auditory perception. Brazier Award-winning article, 2001. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001; 112(4):565-82. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00545-9. View

5.
Binder J, Frost J, Hammeke T, Bellgowan P, Springer J, Kaufman J . Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb Cortex. 2000; 10(5):512-28. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/10.5.512. View