Vespa: Integrated Applications for RF Pulse Design, Spectral Simulation and MRS Data Analysis

Overview

Journal Magn Reson Med

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Radiology

Date 2023 May 15

PMID 37183778

Authors

Brian J Soher

Philip Semanchuk

David Todd

Xiao Ji

Dinesh Deelchand

James Joers

Gulin Oz

Karl Young

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The Vespa package (Versatile Simulation, Pulses, and Analysis) is described and demonstrated. It provides workflows for developing and optimizing linear combination modeling (LCM) fitting for H MRS data using intuitive graphical user interface interfaces for RF pulse design, spectral simulation, and MRS data analysis. Command line interfaces for embedding workflows in MR manufacturer platforms and utilities for synthetic dataset creation are included. Complete provenance is maintained for all steps in workflows.

Theory And Methods: Vespa is written in Python for compatibility across operating systems. It embeds the PyGAMMA spectral simulation library for spectral simulation. Multiprocessing methods accelerate processing and visualization. Applications use the Vespa database for results storage and cross-application access. Three projects demonstrate pulse, sequence, simulation, and data analysis workflows: (1) short TE semi-LASER single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS) LCM fitting, (2) optimizing MEGA-PRESS (MEscher-GArwood Point RESolved Spectroscopy) flip angle and LCM fitting, and (3) creating a synthetic short TE dataset.

Results: The LCM workflows for in vivo basis set creation and spectral analysis showed reasonable results for both the short TE semi-LASER and MEGA-PRESS. Examples of pulses, simulations, and data fitting are shown in Vespa application interfaces for various steps to demonstrate the interactive workflow.

Conclusion: Vespa provides an efficient and extensible platform for characterizing RF pulses, pulse design, spectral simulation optimization, and automated LCM fitting via an interactive platform. Modular design and command line interface make it easy to embed in other platforms. As open source, it is free to the MRS community for use and extension. Vespa source code and documentation are available through GitHub.

Citing Articles

An Accelerated Spectroscopic MRI Metabolite Quantification Based on a Deep Learning Method for Radiation Therapy Planning in Brain Tumor Patients.

Giuffrida A, Ramesh K, Sheriff S, Maudsley A, Weinberg B, Cooper L Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941791 PMC: 11816355. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030423.

Fast Hadamard-Encoded 7T Spectroscopic Imaging of Human Brain.

Moon C, Lieberman F, Hetherington H, Pan J Tomography. 2025; 11(1.

PMID: 39852687 PMC: 11769540. DOI: 10.3390/tomography11010007.

Macromolecule Modelling for Improved Metabolite Quantification Using Short Echo Time Brain H-MRS at 3 T and 7 T: The PRaMM Model.

DellOrco A, Riemann L, Ellison S, Aydin S, Goschel L, Ittermann B NMR Biomed. 2024; 38(1):e5299.

PMID: 39701127 PMC: 11658865. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.5299.

PyAMARES, an Open-Source Python Library for Fitting Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Data.

Xu J, Vaeggemose M, Schulte R, Yang B, Lee C, Laustsen C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(23).

PMID: 39682576 PMC: 11639817. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14232668.

Plasma p-tau181 and GFAP reflect 7T MR-derived changes in Alzheimer's disease: A longitudinal study of structural and functional MRI and MRS.

Goschel L, DellOrco A, Fillmer A, Aydin S, Ittermann B, Riemann L Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(12):8684-8699.

PMID: 39558898 PMC: 11667506. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14318.

References

Oz G, Deelchand D, Wijnen J, Mlynarik V, Xin L, Mekle R . Advanced single voxel H magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques in humans: Experts' consensus recommendations. NMR Biomed. 2020; :e4236. PMC: 7347431. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4236. View

Bartha R, Drost D, Menon R, Williamson P . Spectroscopic lineshape correction by QUECC: combined QUALITY deconvolution and eddy current correction. Magn Reson Med. 2000; 44(4):641-5. DOI: 10.1002/1522-2594(200010)44:4<641::aid-mrm19>3.0.co;2-g. View

Govind V, Young K, Maudsley A . Corrigendum: proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. Govindaraju V, Young K, Maudsley AA, NMR Biomed. 2000; 13: 129-153. NMR Biomed. 2015; 28(7):923-4. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3336. View

Soher B, Vermathen P, Schuff N, Wiedermann D, Meyerhoff D, Weiner M . Short TE in vivo (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging at 1.5 T: acquisition and automated spectral analysis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 18(9):1159-65. DOI: 10.1016/s0730-725x(00)00212-5. View

Edden R, Puts N, Harris A, Barker P, Evans C . Gannet: A batch-processing tool for the quantitative analysis of gamma-aminobutyric acid–edited MR spectroscopy spectra. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 40(6):1445-52. PMC: 4280680. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24478. View

Saleh M, Rimbault D, Mikkelsen M, Oeltzschner G, Wang A, Jiang D . Multi-vendor standardized sequence for edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2019; 189:425-431. PMC: 7008948. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.056. View

Bak M, Rasmussen J, Nielsen N . SIMPSON: a general simulation program for solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson. 2000; 147(2):296-330. DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2179. View

Schulte R, Boesiger P . ProFit: two-dimensional prior-knowledge fitting of J-resolved spectra. NMR Biomed. 2006; 19(2):255-63. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1026. View

Chong D, Kreis R, Bolliger C, Boesch C, Slotboom J . Two-dimensional linear-combination model fitting of magnetic resonance spectra to define the macromolecule baseline using FiTAID, a Fitting Tool for Arrays of Interrelated Datasets. MAGMA. 2011; 24(3):147-64. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-011-0246-y. View

10.

Garwood M, Delabarre L . The return of the frequency sweep: designing adiabatic pulses for contemporary NMR. J Magn Reson. 2001; 153(2):155-77. DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2001.2340. View

11.

Provencher S . Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Reson Med. 1993; 30(6):672-9. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910300604. View

12.

Mlynarik V, Gambarota G, Frenkel H, Gruetter R . Localized short-echo-time proton MR spectroscopy with full signal-intensity acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 56(5):965-70. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21043. View

13.

Wilson M . Adaptive baseline fitting for MR spectroscopy analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 85(1):13-29. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28385. View

14.

Wilson M, Andronesi O, Barker P, Bartha R, Bizzi A, Bolan P . Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 82(2):527-550. PMC: 7179569. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27742. View

15.

Clarke W, Bell T, Emir U, Mikkelsen M, Oeltzschner G, Shamaei A . NIfTI-MRS: A standard data format for magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med. 2022; 88(6):2358-2370. PMC: 7613677. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29418. View

16.

Young K, Govindaraju V, Soher B, Maudsley A . Automated spectral analysis I: formation of a priori information by spectral simulation. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 40(6):812-5. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910400605. View

17.

Zhang Y, An L, Shen J . Fast computation of full density matrix of multispin systems for spatially localized in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Med Phys. 2017; 44(8):4169-4178. PMC: 5578626. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12375. View

18.

Soher B, Young K, Govindaraju V, Maudsley A . Automated spectral analysis III: application to in vivo proton MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1998; 40(6):822-31. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910400607. View

19.

Hui S, Saleh M, Zollner H, Oeltzschner G, Fan H, Li Y . MRSCloud: A cloud-based MRS tool for basis set simulation. Magn Reson Med. 2022; 88(5):1994-2004. PMC: 9420769. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29370. View

20.

Govindaraju V, Young K, Maudsley A . Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR Biomed. 2000; 13(3):129-53. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1492(200005)13:3<129::aid-nbm619>3.0.co;2-v. View