Systematic Review Analyzing Significance of Endometrial Cavity Fluid During Assisted Reproductive Techniques

Overview

Journal Arch Gynecol Obstet

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2023 May 14

PMID 37179498

Authors

Priyanka Kathuria

Navdeep Kaur Ghuman

Garima Yadav

Pratibha Singh

Vrushti Solanki

Nayanika Gaur

Surjit Singh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of our study is to estimate the prevalence of endometrial cavity fluid (ECF) in Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) cycles and analyze its effects on pregnancy outcome in such cycles.

Data Sources: PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for articles. The reference lists of relevant publications were explored for other studies.

Study Eligibility Criteria: Studies that had assessed the pregnancy outcome in ART cycles and had commented on ECF accumulation were included. Pregnancy outcomes were assessed in all ART cycles where ECF was observed and were compared to the non-ECF cycles.

Results: A total of nine studies were included in the meta-analysis for a total of 28,210 cycles. Pooled analysis of the prevalence of ECF cycles out of total cycles in females undergoing ART using a fixed effect model showed that it was 14% (95% CI is 13% to 14%; I2 = 99%, p = < 0.01). The random effect model prevalence of ECF cycles was around 7% (95% CI: 4% to 10%). There was a statistically significant (25%) decrease in pregnancy rates per cycle transfer in the ECF cycle versus the non-ECF cycle group during ART [OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.67-0.84), p < 0.001; moderate quality evidence]. When ECF size was compared, there was a statistically significant increase in pregnancy rates if ECF size was less than 3.5 mm versus greater than or equal to 3.5 mm [OR = 13.67, 95% CI = 1.43-130.40), p = 0.02; high quality evidence]. Sub-group analysis revealed that the ECF present at the time of embryo transfer significantly decreased the pregnancy rates by 26% as compared to the group where the ECF was not present at the time of embryo transfer [OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.65-0.85), p < 0.001].

Conclusions: This meta-analysis proposes that the presence of ECF significantly decreases the implantation and pregnancy rates of ART cycles, and even more so if its size is greater than 3.5 mm. Interventions to decrease ECF formation or treat it have enhanced the pregnancy outcome in ART cycles.

Prospero Registration: Date: 17th September 2020; Number: CRD42020182262.

References

Cavagna M, Petersen C, Mauri A, Oliveira J, Baruffi R, Franco Jr J . Administration of progesterone on the day of oocyte retrieval to reverse accumulation of fluid in the endometrial cavity during assisted reproductive techniques. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022; 18(4):136-138. PMC: 9239418. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20140019. View

Na E, Cha D, Cho J, Kim M . Comparison of IVF-ET outcomes in patients with hydrosalpinx pretreated with either sclerotherapy or laparoscopic salpingectomy. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2013; 39(4):182-6. PMC: 3548078. DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2012.39.4.182. View

He R, Gao H, Li Y, Zhu X . The associated factors to endometrial cavity fluid and the relevant impact on the IVF-ET outcome. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010; 8:46. PMC: 2886001. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-46. View

Chien L, Au H, Xiao J, Tzeng C . Fluid accumulation within the uterine cavity reduces pregnancy rates in women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(2):351-6. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.351. View

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009; 339:b2535. PMC: 2714657. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535. View

Sterne J, Hernan M, Reeves B, Savovic J, Berkman N, Viswanathan M . ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016; 355:i4919. PMC: 5062054. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. View

Kjaergard L, Villumsen J, Gluud C . Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135(11):982-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-11-200112040-00010. View

Akman M, Erden H, Bahceci M . Endometrial fluid visualized through ultrasonography during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles impairs the outcome in tubal factor, but not PCOS, patients. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20(4):906-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh737. View

Lee R, Yu S, Chih Y, Tsai Y, Lin M, Hwu Y . Effect of endometrial cavity fluid on clinical pregnancy rate in tubal embryo transfer (TET). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2006; 23(5):229-34. PMC: 3454912. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-006-9035-3. View

10.

Levi A, Segars J, Miller B, Leondires M . Endometrial cavity fluid is associated with poor ovarian response and increased cancellation rates in ART cycles. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(12):2610-5. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.12.2610. View

11.

Zhang W, Cao L, Zhao Y, Li J, Li B, Lv J . Endometrial cavity fluid is associated with deleterious pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(1):9. PMC: 7859802. DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3623. View

12.

Mansour R, Aboulghar M, Serour G, Riad R . Fluid accumulation of the uterine cavity before embryo transfer: a possible hindrance for implantation. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1991; 8(3):157-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01131707. View

13.

Griffiths A, Watermeyer S, Klentzeris L . Fluid within the endometrial cavity in an IVF cycle--a novel approach to its management. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002; 19(6):298-301. PMC: 3455216. DOI: 10.1023/a:1015785431828. View

14.

Liu S, Shi L, Shi J . Impact of endometrial cavity fluid on assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 132(3):278-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.037. View

15.

Lu S, Peng H, Zhang H, Zhang L, Cao Q, Li R . Excessive intrauterine fluid cause aberrant implantation and pregnancy outcome in mice. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e78446. PMC: 3806840. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078446. View

16.

Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Wainer B, Merlet F, Nisand I . Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(5):1243-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.5.1243. View