Long-Term In Vitro Adhesive Properties of Two Universal Adhesives to Dentin

Overview

Journal Materials (Basel)

Publisher MDPI

Date 2023 May 13

PMID 37176339

Authors

Ana Hurtado

Victoria Fuentes

Maria Cura

Aitana Tamayo

Laura Ceballos

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The composition of universal adhesives, as well as the adhesive strategy, may influence bonding effectiveness and durability. This study aimed to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) and nanoleakage (NL), immediately and after 6-month aging, and in situ degree of conversion (DC), of two universal adhesives (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive, SBU; Xeno Select, XEN) applied with etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE) strategies, in comparison with a two-step SE adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond, CSE). Dentin surfaces of fifty human third molars were randomly assigned to the following adhesives: two universal adhesives, SBU and XEN, applied in ER or SE mode and CSE, used as control. Teeth were sectioned into beams to be tested under µTBS, half of them after 24 h, and the rest after 6 months of water aging. Selected beams from each tooth were used for NL evaluation and in situ DC quantification. SBU and CSE showed significantly higher mean µTBS and lower nanoleakage than XEN, regardless of the evaluation time and adhesion strategy. XEN-SE yielded the lowest degree of conversion. Therefore, adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin are material dependent, regardless of the adhesion strategy, exhibiting XEN a significantly worse performance than SBU.

Citing Articles

Effect of customized bioactive glass in experimental composites on dentin bond strength after 12 months of aging.

Par M, Dukaric K, Marovic D, Taubock T, Attin T, Tarle Z Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 29(1):19.

PMID: 39690350 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-06108-0.

Spectrophotometric Evaluation of the Color Stability of Nanofilled Composites With and Without a Dentin Bonding Agent as a Surface Sealer Following Exposure to Common Beverages.

Alrashidi A, Arjumand B, Al-Mushayqih A, Alharbi B Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73591.

PMID: 39677237 PMC: 11639434. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73591.

Influence of Academic Training and Professional Experience on the Management of Deep Caries Lesions.

Arroyo-Bote S, Ribas-Perez D, Bennasar Verges C, Rodriguez Menacho D, Villalva Hernandez-Franch P, Barbero Navarro I Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(19).

PMID: 39408087 PMC: 11475158. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12191907.

Dentin Bonding Durability of Four Different Recently Introduced Self-Etch Adhesives.

Kitahara S, Shimizu S, Takagaki T, Inokoshi M, Abdou A, Burrow M Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(17).

PMID: 39274686 PMC: 11396391. DOI: 10.3390/ma17174296.

Effect of Simulated Dental Pulpal Pressure Using Fetal Bovine Serum for the Bonding Performance of Contemporary Adhesive to Dentin.

Li Y, Maeno M, Cifuentes-Jimenez C, Komoto M, Liu Y, Nara Y Polymers (Basel). 2024; 16(9).

PMID: 38732688 PMC: 11085566. DOI: 10.3390/polym16091219.

References

Pashaev D, Demirci M, Tekce N, Tuncer S, Baydemir C . The effect of double-coating and times on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of universal adhesives. Biomed Mater Eng. 2017; 28(2):169-185. DOI: 10.3233/BME-171665. View

Kaczor K, Gerula-Szymanska A, Smektala T, Safranow K, Lewusz K, Nowicka A . Effects of different etching modes on the nanoleakage of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018; 30(4):287-298. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12375. View

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M . From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020; 22(1):7-34. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a43994. View

Fehrenbach J, Isolan C, Munchow E . Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dent Mater. 2021; 37(10):1463-1485. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.014. View

Zecin-Deren A, Sokolowski J, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Piwonski I, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B . Multi-Layer Application of Self-Etch and Universal Adhesives and the Effect on Dentin Bond Strength. Molecules. 2019; 24(2). PMC: 6358738. DOI: 10.3390/molecules24020345. View

Munoz M, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha N . In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent. 2014; 40(3):282-92. DOI: 10.2341/14-055-L. View

Munoz M, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio A, Bombarda N . Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013; 41(5):404-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001. View

Kawazu M, Takamizawa T, Hirokane E, Tsujimoto A, Tamura T, Barkmeier W . Comparison of dentin bond durability of a universal adhesive and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2019; 24(8):2889-2897. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03153-y. View

Takamizawa T, Barkmeier W, Tsujimoto A, Berry T, Watanabe H, Erickson R . Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016; 32(2):e9-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005. View

10.

Ahmed M, de Munck J, van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Yoshihara K, Van Meerbeek B . Do Universal Adhesives Benefit from an Extra Bonding Layer?. J Adhes Dent. 2019; 21(2):117-132. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a42304. View

11.

Chen H, Feng S, Jin Y, Hou Y, Zhu S . Comparison of bond strength of universal adhesives using different etching modes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater J. 2021; 41(1):1-10. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2021-111. View

12.

Tsujimoto A, Fischer N, Barkmeier W, Latta M . Bond Durability of Two-Step HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive. J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13(3). PMC: 9505787. DOI: 10.3390/jfb13030134. View

13.

Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M . Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2013; 42(5):603-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008. View

14.

Silva E Souza Jr M, Carneiro K, Lobato M, de Almeida Rodrigues Silva E Souza P, Goes M . Adhesive systems: important aspects related to their composition and clinical use. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18(3):207-14. PMC: 5349047. DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000300002. View

15.

Sanhadji El Haddar Y, Cetik S, Bahrami B, Atash R . A Comparative Study of Microleakage on Dental Surfaces Bonded with Three Self-Etch Adhesive Systems Treated with the Er:YAG Laser and Bur. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:2509757. PMC: 4933862. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2509757. View

16.

Lopes L, Calazans F, Hidalgo R, Buitrago L, Gutierrez F, Reis A . Six-month Follow-up of Cervical Composite Restorations Placed With a New Universal Adhesive System: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2016; 41(5):465-480. DOI: 10.2341/15-309-C. View

17.

Peumans M, Wouters L, de Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, van Landuyt K . Nine-year Clinical Performance of a HEMA-free One-step Self-etch Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2018; 20(3):195-203. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a40630. View

18.

Hardan L, Bourgi R, Kharouf N, Mancino D, Zarow M, Jakubowicz N . Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives to Dentin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13(5). PMC: 7961712. DOI: 10.3390/polym13050814. View

19.

Jang J, Jeon B, Mo S, Park M, Choi D, Choi K . Effect of various agitation methods on adhesive layer formation of HEMA-free universal dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J. 2018; 38(1):101-106. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.2018-031. View

20.

Takahashi M, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Foxton R, Tagami J . Long-term evaluation of water sorption and ultimate tensile strength of HEMA-containing/-free one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent. 2011; 39(7):506-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.008. View