» Articles » PMID: 37692095

The Classification and Selection of Adhesive Agents; an Overview for the General Dentist

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2023 Sep 11
PMID 37692095
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adhesive agents are essential to most restorative procedures used in everyday practice. Depending on the clinical situation, the dentist will choose among a rapidly evolving variety of adhesive agents (bonding agents). Due to the availability of many adhesive agents, appropriate selection can take time and effort. Typically, a practitioner relies more on marketing and experience than in-depth material knowledge. The classification of adhesive agents may need to be clarified and easier to remember due to its lack of relevance to clinical procedures. This paper reviews the published literature retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus by using specific keywords "adhesive agents", "classification", "dentin", "enamel", "universal", "self-etch", "etch-and-rinse", and "bonding". The titles and abstracts were screened, and the relevant literature was retrieved. The list of references from each identified article was examined to find other potentially relevant articles. Adhesive agents can be classified as etch-and-rinse, self-etch, or "multi-mode" according to their approach to interacting with the smear layer, and each approach can be further classified according to the number of clinical steps required during application. This article reviews the classification of current adhesive agents and discusses the properties that make a specific adhesive agent the optimal choice for a particular clinical indication. The review will assist the general dentist in understanding the various types of available adhesive agents and how they function. Overall, the review will facilitate decision-making and allow the selection of appropriate materials.

Citing Articles

Shear Bond Strength of Self-Adhesive Versus Conventional Flowable Composites: An Study.

Chatra A, Nair P, DCosta V, Kukkila J, Mayya A, Chatra L J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024; 14(5):362-368.

PMID: 39677532 PMC: 11637171. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_14_24.


Antibacterial Dental Adhesive Containing Cetylpyridinium Chloride Montmorillonite.

Okazaki Y, Nakamori K, Yao C, Ahmed M, Mercelis B, Nagaoka N Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(17).

PMID: 39274758 PMC: 11395986. DOI: 10.3390/ma17174368.


Current trends in placing posterior composite restorations: Perspectives from Palestinian general dentists: A questionnair study.

Arandi N J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024; 14(2):112-120.

PMID: 38827352 PMC: 11141891. DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_157_23.

References
1.
Huang Y, Wang Y, Lin P, Lai Y, Cheng C, Chiang Y . Dentists' performance in dentin-composite resin bonding before and after hands-on course learning. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019; 119(1 Pt 2):260-267. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.008. View

2.
Malaquias P, Gutierrez M, Sutil E, Matos T, Hanzen T, Reis A . Universal adhesives and dual-cured core buildup composite material: adhesive properties. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020; 28:e20200121. PMC: 7714263. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0121. View

3.
Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B . Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(9):864-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003. View

4.
Suh B, Feng L, Pashley D, Tay F . Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent. 2004; 5(4):267-82. View

5.
Tay F, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, Bouillaguet S, Pashley D, Carvalho R . Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. J Dent. 2004; 32(8):611-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.04.006. View