» Articles » PMID: 37171514

Configuration of Two-stent Coronary Bifurcation Techniques in Explanted Beating Hearts: the MOBBEM Study

Abstract

Background: In patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), various 2-stent techniques might be utilised. The Visible Heart Laboratories (VHL) offer an experimental environment where PCI results can be assessed by multimodality imaging.

Aims: We aimed to assess the post-PCI stent configuration achieved by 2-stent techniques in the VHL and to evaluate the procedural factors associated with suboptimal results.

Methods: Bifurcation PCI with 2-stent techniques, performed by expert operators in the VHL on explanted beating swine hearts, was studied. The adopted bifurcation PCI strategy and the specific procedural steps applied in each procedure were classified according to Main, Across, Distal, Side (MADS)-2 and to their adherence to the European Bifurcation Club (EBC) recommendations. Microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) was used to assess the post-PCI stent configuration. The primary endpoint was "suboptimal stent implantation", defined as a composite of stent underexpansion (<90%), side branch ostial area stenosis >50% and the gap between stents.

Results: A total of 82 PCI with bifurcation stenting were assessed, comprised of 29 crush, 25 culotte, 28 T/T and small protrusion (TAP) techniques. Suboptimal stent implantation was observed in as many as 53.7% of the cases, regardless of baseline anatomy or the stenting strategy. However, less frequent use of the proximal optimisation technique (POT; p=0.015) and kissing balloon inflations (KBI; p=0.027) and no adherence to EBC recommendations (p=0.004, p multivariate=0.006) were significantly associated with the primary endpoint.

Conclusions: Commonly practised bifurcation 2-stent techniques may result in imperfect stent configurations. More frequent use of POT/KBI and adherence to expert recommendations might reduce the occurrence of post-PCI suboptimal stent configurations.

Citing Articles

Multimodal Imaging of Coronary Bifurcation TAP Procedures Utilizing Visible Heart® Methodologies: EBC Recommended Steps and Bailout Procedures.

Stankovic G, Cangemi S, DeVos A, Burzotta F, Iaizzo P Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024; 105(1):135-143.

PMID: 39660931 PMC: 11694539. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31326.


Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions using optimised angiographic guidance: the 18th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.

Burzotta F, Louvard Y, Lassen J, Lefevre T, Finet G, Collet C EuroIntervention. 2024; 20(15):e915-e926.

PMID: 38752714 PMC: 11285041. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00160.

References
1.
Paradies V, Ng J, Lu S, Bulluck H, Burzotta F, Chieffo A . T and Small Protrusion (TAP) vs Double-Kissing Crush Technique: Insights From In Vitro Models. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020; 24:11-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.09.013. View

2.
Burzotta F, Lassen J, Louvard Y, Lefevre T, Banning A, Daremont O . European Bifurcation Club white paper on stenting techniques for patients with bifurcated coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 96(5):1067-1079. PMC: 8915133. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29071. View

3.
Spencer J, Sundaram C, Iaizzo P . The relative anatomy of the coronary arterial and venous systems: implications for coronary interventions. Clin Anat. 2014; 27(7):1023-9. DOI: 10.1002/ca.22419. View

4.
Antoniadis A, Mortier P, Kassab G, Dubini G, Foin N, Murasato Y . Biomechanical Modeling to Improve Coronary Artery Bifurcation Stenting: Expert Review Document on Techniques and Clinical Implementation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(10):1281-1296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.06.015. View

5.
Valenzuela T, Burzotta F, Iles T, Lassen J, Iaizzo P . Assessment of single and double coronary bifurcation stenting techniques using multimodal imaging and 3D modeling in reanimated swine hearts using Visible Heart® methodologies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 37(9):2591-2601. PMC: 8390408. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02240-0. View