» Articles » PMID: 24255135

Frequency-domain Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Patients with Bifurcated Lesions Undergoing Provisional Stenting

Abstract

Aims: Bifurcations represent challenging lesions which may benefit from improved understanding of stent-related vessel complications. Since optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows us to detect post-stenting vessel injuries, we sought to assess the geographic pattern of stent-related complications occurring during provisional stenting of bifurcated lesions.

Methods And Results: Fifty-one patients with bifurcated lesions treated by provisional stenting and undergoing intra-procedural OCT assessment were enrolled. OCT images were acquired with the aim of guiding the percutaneous coronary intervention but were re-analysed off-line for the present study. The stented bifurcation was divided into four segments [three in the main vessel (MV) and one in the side branch (SB)]. The following acute post-stenting vessel injuries/complications at the different bifurcation segments were evaluated: (i) stent under-expansion, (ii) stent malapposition, (iii) stent edge dissection, (iv) side-branch ostium dissection, (v) tissue prolapse, (vi) intracoronary thrombus, and (vii) in-stent dissection. A total of 55 bifurcation lesions undergoing provisional stenting were analysed. At least one OCT complication was detectable in all cases. Across different bifurcation sites, significant differences in the occurrence of stent complications were observed. In particular, stent malapposition was more common at the proximal MV segment (P < 0.001), while tissue prolapse was more common at the distal MV segment (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In bifurcated interventions, OCT often detects vessel injuries/stent complications, which tend to have a specific geographical distribution. In particular, stent malapposition is more common at the proximal MV and tissue prolapse at the distal MV segment.

Citing Articles

Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Amin A, Khlidj Y, Abuelazm M, Sayed A, Khan U, Elewidi M BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024; 24(1):483.

PMID: 39261775 PMC: 11389231. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-024-04105-5.


OCT Guidance in Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Moulias A, Koros R, Papageorgiou A, Patrinos P, Spyropoulou P, Vakka A Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 24(3):88.

PMID: 39077489 PMC: 11264033. DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2403088.


Artificial Intelligence for the Interventional Cardiologist: Powering and Enabling OCT Image Interpretation.

Chandramohan N, Hinton J, OKane P, Johnson T Interv Cardiol. 2024; 19:e03.

PMID: 38532946 PMC: 10964291. DOI: 10.15420/icr.2023.13.


Configuration of two-stent coronary bifurcation techniques in explanted beating hearts: the MOBBEM study.

Cangemi S, Burzotta F, Bianchini F, DeVos A, Valenzuela T, Trani C EuroIntervention. 2023; 19(5):e423-e431.

PMID: 37171514 PMC: 10397672. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00063.


DCB combined with provisional DES implantation in the treatment of De Novo Medina 0,1,0 or 0,0,1 left main coronary bifurcation lesions: A proof-of-concept study.

Erdogan E, Li Z, Zhu Y, Tufaro V, Feng S, Li Q Anatol J Cardiol. 2022; 26(3):218-225.

PMID: 35346908 PMC: 9366374. DOI: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.1157.