» Articles » PMID: 37138744

Oxygen Saturation Targets for Adults with Acute Hypoxemia in Low and Lower-middle Income Countries: a Scoping Review with Analysis of Contextual Factors

Abstract

Knowing the target oxygen saturation (SpO) range that results in the best outcomes for acutely hypoxemic adults is important for clinical care, training, and research in low-income and lower-middle income countries (collectively LMICs). The evidence we have for SpO targets emanates from high-income countries (HICs), and therefore may miss important contextual factors for LMIC settings. Furthermore, the evidence from HICs is mixed, amplifying the importance of specific circumstances. For this literature review and analysis, we considered SpO targets used in previous trials, international and national society guidelines, and direct trial evidence comparing outcomes using different SpO ranges (all from HICs). We also considered contextual factors, including emerging data on pulse oximetry performance in different skin pigmentation ranges, the risk of depleting oxygen resources in LMIC settings, the lack of access to arterial blood gases that necessitates consideration of the subpopulation of hypoxemic patients who are also hypercapnic, and the impact of altitude on median SpO values. This process of integrating prior study protocols, society guidelines, available evidence, and contextual factors is potentially useful for the development of other clinical guidelines for LMIC settings. We suggest that a goal SpO range of 90-94% is reasonable, using high-performing pulse oximeters. Answering context-specific research questions, such as an optimal SpO target range in LMIC contexts, is critical for advancing equity in clinical outcomes globally.

Citing Articles

Reducing global inequities in medical oxygen access: the Lancet Global Health Commission on medical oxygen security.

Graham H, King C, Rahman A, Kitutu F, Greenslade L, Aqeel M Lancet Glob Health. 2025; 13(3):e528-e584.

PMID: 39978385 PMC: 11865010. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00496-0.


Outcomes of guidelines from health technology assessment organizations in community-based primary care: a systematic mixed studies review.

Baradaran A, Tolentino R, Grad R, Ganache I, Gore G, Abbasgholizadeh Rahimi S Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024; 40(1):e56.

PMID: 39539094 PMC: 11579698. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462324000370.


Early Operative Risk Assessment Using the Modified Mannheim Peritonitis Index in Patients With Generalised Peritonitis at a Tertiary Hospital in Abuja, Nigeria.

Situ O, Okoye O, Olaomi O, Akhigbe D, Batta C, Ajibola O Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69709.

PMID: 39429355 PMC: 11490270. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69709.


Exploring the bias: how skin color influences oxygen saturation readings via Monte Carlo simulations.

Swamy S, Liu C, Correia R, Hayes-Gill B, Morgan S J Biomed Opt. 2024; 29(Suppl 3):S33308.

PMID: 39211937 PMC: 11358849. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.S3.S33308.


Hospital Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis from the UAE.

Mohamed Y, Mukhtar M, Elmalti A, Kheirallah K, Panigrahi D, Abu-Rish E Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(6).

PMID: 38928943 PMC: 11204093. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21060697.

References
1.
Mart M, Sendagire C, Ely E, Riviello E, Twagirumugabe T . Oxygen as an Essential Medicine. Crit Care Clin. 2022; 38(4):795-808. PMC: 9417445. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.06.010. View

2.
Shapiro N, Douglas I, Brower R, Brown S, Exline M, Ginde A . Early Restrictive or Liberal Fluid Management for Sepsis-Induced Hypotension. N Engl J Med. 2023; 388(6):499-510. PMC: 10685906. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212663. View

3.
Gudelunas M, Lipnick M, Hendrickson C, Vanderburg S, Okunlola B, Auchus I . Low Perfusion and Missed Diagnosis of Hypoxemia by Pulse Oximetry in Darkly Pigmented Skin: A Prospective Study. Anesth Analg. 2023; 138(3):552-561. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006755. View

4.
Asfar P, Schortgen F, Boisrame-Helms J, Charpentier J, Guerot E, Megarbane B . Hyperoxia and hypertonic saline in patients with septic shock (HYPERS2S): a two-by-two factorial, multicentre, randomised, clinical trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017; 5(3):180-190. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30046-2. View

5.
Moore Jr K, Gudelunas K, Lipnick M, Bickler P, Hendrickson C . Pulse Oximeter Bias and Inequities in Retrospective Studies--Now What?. Respir Care. 2022; 67(12):1633-1636. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10654. View