» Articles » PMID: 37132372

Lights, Fluorescence, Action-Influencing Wound Treatment Plans Including Debridement of Bacteria and Biofilms

Abstract

High bacterial loads within chronic wounds increase the risk of infection and complication. Detection and localization of bacterial loads through point-of-care fluorescence (FL) imaging can objectively inform and support bacterial treatment decisions. This single time-point, retrospective analysis describes the treatment decisions made on 1000 chronic wounds (DFUs, VLUs, PIs, surgical wounds, burns, and others) at 211 wound-care facilities across 36 US states. Clinical assessment findings and treatment plans derived from them, as well as subsequent FL-imaging (MolecuLight®) findings and any associated treatment plan changes, were recorded for analysis. FL signals indicating elevated bacterial loads were observed in 701 wounds (70.8%), while only 293 (29.6%) showed signs/symptoms of infection. After FL-imaging, treatment plans changed in 528 wounds as follows: more extensive debridement (18.7%), more extensive hygiene (17.2%), FL-targeted debridement (17.2%), new topical therapies (10.1%), new systemic antibiotic prescriptions (9.0%), FL-guided sampling for microbiological analysis (6.2%), and changes in dressing selection (3.2%). These real-world findings of asymptomatic bacterial load/biofilm incidence, and of the frequent treatment plan changes post-imaging, are in accordance with clinical trial findings using this technology. These data, from a range of wound types, facilities, and clinician skill sets, suggest that point-of-care FL-imaging information improves bacterial infection management.

Citing Articles

Assessing Biofilm at the Bedside: Exploring Reliable Accessible Biofilm Detection Methods.

Mayer P, Smith A, Hurlow J, Morrow B, Bohn G, Bowler P Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(19).

PMID: 39410520 PMC: 11475494. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14192116.


Integrating Point-of-Care Bacterial Fluorescence Imaging-Guided Care with Continued Wound Measurement for Enhanced Wound Area Reduction Monitoring.

Derwin R, Patton D, Strapp H, Moore Z Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38201311 PMC: 10802895. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14010002.


Lights, fluorescence, action-Influencing wound treatment plans including debridement of bacteria and biofilms.

Jacob A, Jones L, Abdo R, Cruz-Schiavone S, Skerker R, Caputo W Int Wound J. 2023; 20(8):3279-3288.

PMID: 37132372 PMC: 10502265. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14208.

References
1.
Moffatt C, Kommala D, Dourdin N, Choe Y . Venous leg ulcers: patient concordance with compression therapy and its impact on healing and prevention of recurrence. Int Wound J. 2009; 6(5):386-93. PMC: 7951474. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00634.x. View

2.
Armstrong D, Edmonds M, Serena T . Point-of-care fluorescence imaging reveals extent of bacterial load in diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2023; 20(2):554-566. PMC: 9885466. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14080. View

3.
Espejo E, Andres M, Borrallo R, Padilla E, Garcia-Restoy E, Bella F . Bacteremia associated with pressure ulcers: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018; 37(5):969-975. PMC: 5916975. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3216-8. View

4.
Rahma S, Woods J, Brown S, Nixon J, Russell D . The Use of Point-of-Care Bacterial Autofluorescence Imaging in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45(7):1601-1609. DOI: 10.2337/dc21-2218. View

5.
Ottolino-Perry K, Chamma E, Blackmore K, Lindvere-Teene L, Starr D, Tapang K . Improved detection of clinically relevant wound bacteria using autofluorescence image-guided sampling in diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2017; 14(5):833-841. PMC: 7949847. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12717. View