» Articles » PMID: 37132013

Preclinical Models for Development of Immune-oncology Therapies

Overview
Date 2023 May 3
PMID 37132013
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Immunotherapy has demonstrated great success in clinical treatment, especially for cancer care. Here we review preclinical models, including cell lines, three dimensional (3D) cultures, and mouse models to support the need for tools enabling the development of novel immune-oncology (I-O) therapies. While studies have the advantage of being relatively simpler, faster, and higher throughput than models, they must be designed carefully to recapitulate the biological conditions that influence drug efficacy. The growing prevalence of 3D and models has enabled screening and mechanistic studies in more complex, tissue-like environments containing multiple interacting cell types. On the other hand, syngeneic mouse models have been instrumental in the historical development of immunotherapies and remain an important tool in drug development, despite lacking fidelity to certain aspects of human physiology and pathology. Xenograft and humanized mouse models address some of these challenges, yet present limitations of their own. Successful development and translation of new I-O therapies will likely require thoughtful combination of several of these preclinical models, and we aim to help research and development scientists utilize the appropriate tools and technologies to facilitate rapid transition from preclinical evaluation to clinical trials.

Citing Articles

Affinity fine-tuning anti-CAIX CAR-T cells mitigate on-target off-tumor side effects.

Wang Y, Buck A, Piel B, Zerefa L, Murugan N, Coherd C Mol Cancer. 2024; 23(1):56.

PMID: 38491381 PMC: 10943873. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-024-01952-w.


Immune-restoring CAR-T cells display antitumor activity and reverse immunosuppressive TME in a humanized ccRCC mouse model.

Wang Y, Cho J, Kastrunes G, Buck A, Razimbaud C, Culhane A iScience. 2024; 27(2):108879.

PMID: 38327771 PMC: 10847687. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108879.


Evolution of cell therapy for renal cell carcinoma.

Wang Y, Suarez E, Kastrunes G, de Campos N, Abbas R, Pivetta R Mol Cancer. 2024; 23(1):8.

PMID: 38195534 PMC: 10775455. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01911-x.

References
1.
Chavez K, Garimella S, Lipkowitz S . Triple negative breast cancer cell lines: one tool in the search for better treatment of triple negative breast cancer. Breast Dis. 2011; 32(1-2):35-48. PMC: 3532890. DOI: 10.3233/BD-2010-0307. View

2.
Maude S, Laetsch T, Buechner J, Rives S, Boyer M, Bittencourt H . Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(5):439-448. PMC: 5996391. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709866. View

3.
Vande Voorde J, Ackermann T, Pfetzer N, Sumpton D, Mackay G, Kalna G . Improving the metabolic fidelity of cancer models with a physiological cell culture medium. Sci Adv. 2019; 5(1):eaau7314. PMC: 6314821. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau7314. View

4.
Pereira P, Berisha N, Bhupathiraju N, Fernandes R, Tome J, Drain C . Cancer cell spheroids are a better screen for the photodynamic efficiency of glycosylated photosensitizers. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177737. PMC: 5435229. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177737. View

5.
Nicolini F, Cashman J, Hogge D, Humphries R, Eaves C . NOD/SCID mice engineered to express human IL-3, GM-CSF and Steel factor constitutively mobilize engrafted human progenitors and compromise human stem cell regeneration. Leukemia. 2003; 18(2):341-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403222. View