» Articles » PMID: 37118605

A Sustainable Future for Africa Through Continental Free Trade and Agricultural Development

Overview
Journal Nat Food
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37118605
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Developing and integrating agricultural markets may be key to addressing Africa's sustainability challenges. By modelling trade costs from farm gate to potential import markets across eight African regions, we investigate the impact of individual components of continental free trade and the complementary role of domestic agricultural development through increased market access for farmers and agricultural intensification. We find that free trade would increase intra-African agricultural trade sixfold by 2030 but-since it does not address local supply constraints-outside food imports and undernourishment would reduce only marginally. Agricultural development could almost eliminate undernourishment in Africa by 2050 at only a small cost of increased global greenhouse gas emissions. While continental free trade will be enabled in Africa through the African Continental Free Trade Area, aligning this with local agricultural development policies is crucial to increase intra-African trade gains, promote food security and achieve climate objectives.

Citing Articles

Impact of interprovincial pairing assistance policies on sustainable agricultural development in Xinjiang of China.

Shengwu Z, Juan H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8372.

PMID: 40069375 PMC: 11897137. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-92502-x.


Heterogeneities in landed costs of traded grains and oilseeds contribute to unequal access to food.

Verschuur J, Vittis Y, Obersteiner M, Hall J Nat Food. 2025; 6(1):36-46.

PMID: 39762466 PMC: 11772242. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01087-7.


Factors that drive unequal access to international grain markets.

Nat Food. 2025; 6(1):15-16.

PMID: 39762465 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01091-x.


Addressing future food demand in The Gambia: can increased crop productivity and climate change adaptation close the supply-demand gap?.

Carr T, Addo F, Palazzo A, Havlik P, Perez-Guzman K, Ali Z Food Secur. 2024; 16(3):691-704.

PMID: 38770159 PMC: 11102352. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-024-01444-1.


Rice availability and stability in Africa under future socio-economic development and climatic change.

De Vos K, Janssens C, Jacobs L, Campforts B, Boere E, Kozicka M Nat Food. 2023; 4(6):518-527.

PMID: 37337082 PMC: 10289898. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00770-5.


References
1.
Jayne T, Sanchez P . Agricultural productivity must improve in sub-Saharan Africa. Science. 2021; 372(6546):1045-1047. DOI: 10.1126/science.abf5413. View

2.
Hong C, Burney J, Pongratz J, Nabel J, Mueller N, Jackson R . Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961-2017. Nature. 2021; 589(7843):554-561. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-03138-y. View

3.
van Ittersum M, van Bussel L, Wolf J, Grassini P, van Wart J, Guilpart N . Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(52):14964-14969. PMC: 5206509. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1610359113. View

4.
Hertel T, Ramankutty N, Baldos U . Global market integration increases likelihood that a future African Green Revolution could increase crop land use and CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(38):13799-804. PMC: 4183291. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403543111. View

5.
Sheahan M, Barrett C . Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy. 2017; 67:12-25. PMC: 5384438. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.010. View