» Articles » PMID: 37118462

Individual US Diets Show Wide Variation in Water Scarcity Footprints

Overview
Journal Nat Food
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37118462
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Agriculture accounts for 80% of global freshwater consumption but the environmental impacts of water use are highly localized and depend on water scarcity. The water use impacts of food production should be a key consideration of sustainable diets, yet little is known of the water scarcity demands of diets, especially of individuals. Here we estimate the water scarcity footprint (WSF)-a water use impact metric that accounts for regional scarcity-of individual diets in the United States (n = 16,800) and find a fivefold variation between the highest and lowest quintile of diets ranked by WSF. Larger intakes of some meat, fruit, nuts and vegetables drive these differences. Meat consumption is the greatest contributor (31%) to the WSF of the average diet, and within that, beef contributes about six times that of chicken. Variation between substitutable foods provides insight into diet shifts that can reduce WSF. We introduce a novel, geospatially explicit approach that combines the types and quantities of foods in the diets of individuals, the irrigation water required to produce those foods and the relative scarcity of water where that irrigation occurs.

Citing Articles

Modeled sustainability impacts of increasing pork consumption among adults in the United States.

Conrad Z, Repoulis V, Zavela C Front Nutr. 2025; 11:1508601.

PMID: 39897535 PMC: 11783847. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1508601.


Greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern in the United States is associated with sustainability trade-offs.

Conrad Z, Korol M, DiStaso C, Wu S Nutr J. 2024; 23(1):159.

PMID: 39707312 PMC: 11661342. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-024-01050-z.


Reduced red and processed meat consumption is associated with lower diet costs in US households: a national analysis of protein substitutions.

Orta-Aleman D, Thorne-Lyman A, Neff R, Wolfson J, Caulfield L Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e205.

PMID: 39385430 PMC: 11604326. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024001897.


Mexican national dietary guidelines promote less costly and environmentally sustainable diets.

Unar-Munguia M, Cervantes-Armenta M, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Bonvecchio Arenas A, Fernandez Gaxiola A, Rivera J Nat Food. 2024; 5(8):703-713.

PMID: 39107420 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01027-5.


Augmenting the National Nutrition Data System to Promote Diet Sustainability Analyses.

Conrad Z, DiStaso C, Korol M, Rose D Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 8(7):103793.

PMID: 39045145 PMC: 11262171. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.103793.


References
1.
Tilman D, Clark M . Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature. 2014; 515(7528):518-22. DOI: 10.1038/nature13959. View

2.
Azevedo L, Henderson A, van Zelm R, Jolliet O, Huijbregts M . Assessing the importance of spatial variability versus model choices in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: the case of freshwater eutrophication in Europe. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(23):13565-70. DOI: 10.1021/es403422a. View

3.
Whitmee S, Haines A, Beyrer C, Boltz F, Capon A, de Souza Dias B . Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet. 2015; 386(10007):1973-2028. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1. View

4.
Blackstone N, El-Abbadi N, McCabe M, Griffin T, Nelson M . Linking sustainability to the healthy eating patterns of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans: a modelling study. Lancet Planet Health. 2018; 2(8):e344-e352. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30167-0. View

5.
Gephart J, Davis K, Emery K, Leach A, Galloway J, Pace M . The environmental cost of subsistence: Optimizing diets to minimize footprints. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 553:120-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.050. View