» Articles » PMID: 37117500

Supply Chains for Processed Potato and Tomato Products in the United States Will Have Enhanced Resilience with Planting Adaptation Strategies

Abstract

Food systems are increasingly challenged to meet growing demand for specialty crops due to the effects of climate change and increased competition for resources. Here, we apply an integrated methodology that includes climate, crop, economic and life cycle assessment models to US potato and tomato supply chains. We find that supply chains for two popular processed products in the United States, French fries and pasta sauce, will be remarkably resilient, through planting adaptation strategies that avoid higher temperatures. Land and water footprints will decline over time due to higher yields, and greenhouse gas emissions can be mitigated by waste reduction and process modification. Our integrated methodology can be applied to other crops, health-based consumer scenarios (fresh versus processed) and geographies, thereby informing decision-making throughout supply chains. Employing such methods will be essential as food systems are forced to adapt and transform to become carbon neutral due to the imperatives of climate change.

References
1.
Willett W, Rockstrom J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S . Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019; 393(10170):447-492. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. View

2.
Mason-DCroz D, Bogard J, Sulser T, Cenacchi N, Dunston S, Herrero M . Gaps between fruit and vegetable production, demand, and recommended consumption at global and national levels: an integrated modelling study. Lancet Planet Health. 2019; 3(7):e318-e329. PMC: 6637854. DOI: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30095-6. View

3.
Marklein A, Elias E, Nico P, Steenwerth K . Projected temperature increases may require shifts in the growing season of cool-season crops and the growing locations of warm-season crops. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 746:140918. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140918. View

4.
Scheelbeek P, Bird F, Tuomisto H, Green R, Harris F, Joy E . Effect of environmental changes on vegetable and legume yields and nutritional quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(26):6804-6809. PMC: 6042093. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800442115. View

5.
Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D, Ruane A, Muller C, Arneth A . Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 111(9):3268-73. PMC: 3948251. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222463110. View