» Articles » PMID: 37115539

Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health Vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Government and the pharmaceutical industry make substantive contributions to pharmaceutical innovation. This study compared the investments by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and industry and estimated the cost basis for assessing the balance of social and private returns.

Objectives: To compare NIH and industry investments in recent drug approvals.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study of NIH funding associated with drugs approved by the FDA from 2010 to 2019 was conducted from May 2020 to July 2022 and accounted for basic and applied research, failed clinical candidates, and discount rates for government spending compared with analogous estimates of industry investment.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Costs from the NIH for research associated with drug approvals.

Results: Funding from the NIH was contributed to 354 of 356 drugs (99.4%) approved from 2010 to 2019 totaling $187 billion, with a mean (SD) $1344.6 ($1433.1) million per target for basic research on drug targets and $51.8 ($96.8) million per drug for applied research on products. Including costs for failed clinical candidates, mean (SD) NIH costs were $1441.5 ($1372.0) million per approval or $1730.3 ($1657.6) million per approval, estimated with a 3% discount rate. The mean (SD) NIH spending was $2956.0 ($3106.3) million per approval with a 10.5% cost of capital, which estimates the cost savings to industry from NIH spending. Spending and approval by NIH for 81 first-to-target drugs was greater than reported industry spending on 63 drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 (difference, -$1998.4 million; 95% CI, -$3302.1 million to -$694.6 million; P = .003). Spending from the NIH was not less than industry spending considering clinical failures, a 3% discount rate for NIH spending, and a 10.5% cost of capital for the industry (difference, -$1435.3 million; 95% CI, -$3114.6 million to $244.0 million; P = .09) or when industry spending included prehuman research (difference, -$1394.8 million; 95% CI, -$3774.8 million to $985.2 million; P = .25). Accounting for spillovers of NIH-funded basic research on drug targets to multiple products, NIH costs were $711.3 million with a 3% discount rate, which was less than the range of reported industry costs with 10.5% cost of capital.

Conclusions And Relevance: The results of this cross-sectional study found that NIH investment in drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 was not less than investment by the pharmaceutical industry, with comparable accounting for basic and applied research, failed clinical trials, and cost of capital or discount rates. The relative scale of NIH and industry investment may provide a cost basis for calibrating the balance of social and private returns from investments in pharmaceutical innovation.

Citing Articles

New Drug Expenditure by Therapeutic Area in South Korea: International Comparison and Policy Implications.

Yu S, Choi S Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(5).

PMID: 40077030 PMC: 11899685. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13050468.


How the NIH dominates the world's health research - in charts.

Gaind N Nature. 2025; .

PMID: 40065180 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-025-00754-4.


Policy options for the drug pricing conundrum.

Ho K, Pakes A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(9):e2418540122.

PMID: 39999179 PMC: 11892685. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2418540122.


What should we be studying? Research priorities according to women and gender-diverse individuals with sexual interest/arousal disorder and their partners.

Shimizu J, Bergeron S, Schwenck G, Huberman J, Rosen N J Sex Med. 2024; 21(11):1020-1029.

PMID: 39301915 PMC: 11534371. DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdae121.


Identifying genetically-supported drug repurposing targets for non-small cell lung cancer through mendelian randomization of the druggable genome.

Feng Y, Li C, Cheng B, Chen Y, Chen P, Wang Z Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024; 13(8):1780-1793.

PMID: 39263038 PMC: 11384480. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-65.


References
1.
Lakdawalla D, Doshi J, Garrison Jr L, Phelps C, Basu A, Danzon P . Defining Elements of Value in Health Care-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3]. Value Health. 2018; 21(2):131-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.007. View

2.
Wouters O, Mckee M, Luyten J . Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018. JAMA. 2020; 323(9):844-853. PMC: 7054832. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.1166. View

3.
DiMasi J, Grabowski H, Hansen R . Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs. J Health Econ. 2016; 47:20-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012. View

4.
Sampat B, Lichtenberg F . What are the respective roles of the public and private sectors in pharmaceutical innovation?. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011; 30(2):332-9. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0917. View

5.
Santos R, Ursu O, Gaulton A, Bento A, Donadi R, Bologa C . A comprehensive map of molecular drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016; 16(1):19-34. PMC: 6314433. DOI: 10.1038/nrd.2016.230. View