» Articles » PMID: 32125401

Profitability of Large Pharmaceutical Companies Compared With Other Large Public Companies

Overview
Journal JAMA
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2020 Mar 4
PMID 32125401
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Importance: Understanding the profitability of pharmaceutical companies is essential to formulating evidence-based policies to reduce drug costs while maintaining the industry's ability to innovate and provide essential medicines.

Objective: To compare the profitability of large pharmaceutical companies with other large companies.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study compared the annual profits of 35 large pharmaceutical companies with 357 companies in the S&P 500 Index from 2000 to 2018 using information from annual financial reports. A statistically significant differential profit margin favoring pharmaceutical companies was evidence of greater profitability.

Exposures: Large pharmaceutical vs nonpharmaceutical companies.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The main outcomes were revenue and 3 measures of annual profit: gross profit (revenue minus the cost of goods sold); earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA; pretax profit from core business activities); and net income, also referred to as earnings (difference between all revenues and expenses). Profit measures are described as cumulative for all companies from 2000 to 2018 or annual profit as a fraction of revenue (margin).

Results: From 2000 to 2018, 35 large pharmaceutical companies reported cumulative revenue of $11.5 trillion, gross profit of $8.6 trillion, EBITDA of $3.7 trillion, and net income of $1.9 trillion, while 357 S&P 500 companies reported cumulative revenue of $130.5 trillion, gross profit of $42.1 trillion, EBITDA of $22.8 trillion, and net income of $9.4 trillion. In bivariable regression models, the median annual profit margins of pharmaceutical companies were significantly greater than those of S&P 500 companies (gross profit margin: 76.5% vs 37.4%; difference, 39.1% [95% CI, 32.5%-45.7%]; P < .001; EBITDA margin: 29.4% vs 19%; difference, 10.4% [95% CI, 7.1%-13.7%]; P < .001; net income margin: 13.8% vs 7.7%; difference, 6.1% [95% CI, 2.5%-9.7%]; P < .001). The differences were smaller in regression models controlling for company size and year and when considering only companies reporting research and development expense (gross profit margin: difference, 30.5% [95% CI, 20.9%-40.1%]; P < .001; EBITDA margin: difference, 9.2% [95% CI, 5.2%-13.2%]; P < .001; net income margin: difference, 3.6% [95% CI, 0.011%-7.2%]; P = .05).

Conclusions And Relevance: From 2000 to 2018, the profitability of large pharmaceutical companies was significantly greater than other large, public companies, but the difference was less pronounced when considering company size, year, or research and development expense. Data on the profitability of large pharmaceutical companies may be relevant to formulating evidence-based policies to make medicines more affordable.

Citing Articles

Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.

Elshiekh C, Ruda R, Cliff E, Gany F, Budhu J Neurooncol Pract. 2025; 12(Suppl 1):i49-i58.

PMID: 39776525 PMC: 11703369. DOI: 10.1093/nop/npae098.


Costs of Drug Development and Research and Development Intensity in the US, 2000-2018.

Sertkaya A, Beleche T, Jessup A, Sommers B JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(6):e2415445.

PMID: 38941099 PMC: 11214120. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15445.


REPRESENTATION AND EXTRAPOLATION: EVIDENCE FROM CLINICAL TRIALS.

Alsan M, Durvasula M, Gupta H, Schwartzstein J, Williams H Q J Econ. 2024; 139(1):575-635.

PMID: 38859982 PMC: 11164133. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjad036.


Paediatric Drug Development in China: Current Status and Future Prospects.

Song L, Zhang N, Jiang T, Jia Y, Liu Y Paediatr Drugs. 2024; 26(5):555-563.

PMID: 38837008 DOI: 10.1007/s40272-024-00636-8.


New Anticancer Drugs: Reliably Assessing "Value" While Addressing High Prices.

Stewart D, Bradford J, Sehdev S, Ramsay T, Navani V, Rawson N Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(5):2453-2480.

PMID: 38785465 PMC: 11119944. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050184.


References
1.
Dusetzina S, Bach P . Prescription Drugs-List Price, Net Price, and the Rebate Caught in the Middle. JAMA. 2019; 321(16):1563-1564. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.2445. View

2.
Califf R, Slavitt A . Lowering Cost and Increasing Access to Drugs Without Jeopardizing Innovation. JAMA. 2019; 321(16):1571-1573. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.3846. View

3.
Kinch M, Haynesworth A, Kinch S, Hoyer D . An overview of FDA-approved new molecular entities: 1827-2013. Drug Discov Today. 2014; 19(8):1033-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.03.018. View

4.
Angell M . The pharmaceutical industry--to whom is it accountable?. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(25):1902-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422509. View

5.
Kesselheim A, Avorn J, Sarpatwari A . The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform. JAMA. 2016; 316(8):858-71. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.11237. View