» Articles » PMID: 37112981

The Role of Airborne Particles in the Epidemiology of Clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus in Commercial Poultry Production Units

Overview
Journal Viruses
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37112981
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Since October 2021, Europe has experienced the largest avian influenza virus (AIV) epizootic, caused by clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 high pathogenicity AIV (HPAIV), with over 284 poultry infected premises (IPs) and 2480 dead H5N1-positive wild birds detected in Great Britain alone. Many IPs have presented as geographical clusters, raising questions about the lateral spread between premises by airborne particles. Airborne transmission over short distances has been observed for some AIV strains. However, the risk of airborne spread of this strain remains to be elucidated. We conducted extensive sampling from IPs where clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 HPAIVs were confirmed during the 2022/23 epizootic, each representing a major poultry species (ducks, turkeys, and chickens). A range of environmental samples were collected inside and outside houses, including deposited dust, feathers, and other potential fomites. Viral RNA (vRNA) and infectious viruses were detected in air samples collected from inside and outside but in close proximity to infected houses, with vRNA alone being detected at greater distances (≤10 m) outside. Some dust samples collected outside of the affected houses contained infectious viruses, while feathers from the affected houses, located up to 80 m away, only contained vRNA. Together, these data suggest that airborne particles harboring infectious HPAIV can be translocated short distances (<10 m) through the air, while macroscopic particles containing vRNA might travel further (≤80 m). Therefore, the potential for airborne transmission of clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 HPAIV between premises is considered low. Other factors, including indirect contact with wild birds and the efficiency of biosecurity, represent greater importance in disease incursion.

Citing Articles

Hybrid barn: the switch from a naturally to a mechanically ventilated turkey barn to protect from harmful bioaerosols.

Sake B, Butenholz K, Kempf K, Kemper N, Schulz J Front Vet Sci. 2025; 12:1443139.

PMID: 40046422 PMC: 11881083. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1443139.


Detection of airborne wild waterbird-derived DNA demonstrates potential for transmission of avian influenza virus via air inlets into poultry houses, the Netherlands, 2021 to 2022.

Bossers A, de Rooij M, van Schothorst I, Velkers F, Smit L Euro Surveill. 2024; 29(40).

PMID: 39364599 PMC: 11451133. DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.40.2400350.


Viral shedding and environmental dispersion of two clade 2.3.4.4b H5 high pathogenicity avian influenza viruses in experimentally infected mule ducks: implications for environmental sampling.

Filaire F, Bertran K, Gaide N, Valle R, Secula A, Perlas A Vet Res. 2024; 55(1):100.

PMID: 39135123 PMC: 11318174. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-024-01357-z.


Quantitative Risk Assessment of Wind-Supported Transmission of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus to Dutch Poultry Farms via Fecal Particles from Infected Wild Birds in the Environment.

de Vos C, Elbers A Pathogens. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 39057798 PMC: 11279698. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13070571.


Preventive, safety and control measures against Avian Influenza A(H5N1) in occupationally exposed groups: A scoping review.

Catalan Saenz H, Cruz-Ausejo L One Health. 2024; 19:100766.

PMID: 39021558 PMC: 11253690. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100766.


References
1.
Asadi S, Gaaloul Ben Hnia N, Barre R, Wexler A, Ristenpart W, Bouvier N . Influenza A virus is transmissible via aerosolized fomites. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):4062. PMC: 7435178. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17888-w. View

2.
Wei J, Zhou J, Liu Y, Wu J, Jin T, Li Y . A novel partial lid for mechanical defeatherers reduced aerosol dispersion during processing of avian influenza virus infected poultry. PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0216478. PMC: 6505957. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216478. View

3.
Irwin C, Yoon K, Wang C, Hoff S, Zimmerman J, Denagamage T . Using the systematic review methodology to evaluate factors that influence the persistence of influenza virus in environmental matrices. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 77(3):1049-60. PMC: 3028706. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02733-09. View

4.
Wille M, Brojer C, Lundkvist A, Jarhult J . Alternate routes of influenza A virus infection in Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). Vet Res. 2018; 49(1):110. PMC: 6206871. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-018-0604-0. View

5.
Elbers A, Gonzales J, Koene M, Germeraad E, Hakze-van der Honing R, van der Most M . Monitoring Wind-Borne Particle Matter Entering Poultry Farms via the Air-Inlet: Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus and Other Pathogens Risk. Pathogens. 2022; 11(12). PMC: 9788232. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11121534. View