» Articles » PMID: 38033641

Control Technologies to Prevent Aerosol-based Disease Transmission in Animal Agriculture Production Settings: a Review of Established and Emerging Approaches

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2023 Nov 30
PMID 38033641
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transmission of infectious agents via aerosols is an ever-present concern in animal agriculture production settings, as the aerosol route to disease transmission can lead to difficult-to-control and costly diseases, such as porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus and influenza A virus. It is increasingly necessary to implement control technologies to mitigate aerosol-based disease transmission. Here, we review currently utilized and prospective future aerosol control technologies to collect and potentially inactivate pathogens in aerosols, with an emphasis on technologies that can be incorporated into mechanically driven (forced air) ventilation systems to prevent aerosol-based disease spread from facility to facility. Broadly, we find that control technologies can be grouped into three categories: (1) currently implemented technologies; (2) scaled technologies used in industrial and medical settings; and (3) emerging technologies. Category (1) solely consists of fibrous filter media, which have been demonstrated to reduce the spread of PRRSV between swine production facilities. We review the mechanisms by which filters function and are rated (minimum efficiency reporting values). Category (2) consists of electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), used industrially to collect aerosol particles in higher flow rate systems, and ultraviolet C (UV-C) systems, used in medical settings to inactivate pathogens. Finally, category (3) consists of a variety of technologies, including ionization-based systems, microwaves, and those generating reactive oxygen species, often with the goal of pathogen inactivation in aerosols. As such technologies are typically first tested through varied means at the laboratory scale, we additionally review control technology testing techniques at various stages of development, from laboratory studies to field demonstration, and in doing so, suggest uniform testing and report standards are needed. Testing standards should consider the cost-benefit of implementing the technologies applicable to the livestock species of interest. Finally, we examine economic models for implementing aerosol control technologies, defining the collected infectious particles per unit energy demand.

Citing Articles

Aerodynamic Size-Dependent Collection and Inactivation of Virus-Laden Aerosol Particles in an Electrostatic Precipitator.

Wang L, Moran J, Olson B, Yang M, Hogan Jr C, Torremorell M Environ Sci Technol. 2024; .

PMID: 39259020 PMC: 11430179. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c03820.

References
1.
Assadi I, Guesmi A, Baaloudj O, Zeghioud H, Elfalleh W, Benhammadi N . Review on inactivation of airborne viruses using non-thermal plasma technologies: from MS2 to coronavirus. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021; 29(4):4880-4892. PMC: 8601095. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17486-3. View

2.
Alavy M, Siegel J . In-situ effectiveness of residential HVAC filters. Indoor Air. 2019; 30(1):156-166. DOI: 10.1111/ina.12617. View

3.
Hogan Jr C, Kettleson E, Lee M, Ramaswami B, Angenent L, Biswas P . Sampling methodologies and dosage assessment techniques for submicrometre and ultrafine virus aerosol particles. J Appl Microbiol. 2005; 99(6):1422-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02720.x. View

4.
Reed N . The history of ultraviolet germicidal irradiation for air disinfection. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(1):15-27. PMC: 2789813. DOI: 10.1177/003335491012500105. View

5.
Kaushik N, Mitra S, Baek E, Nguyen L, Bhartiya P, Kim J . The inactivation and destruction of viruses by reactive oxygen species generated through physical and cold atmospheric plasma techniques: Current status and perspectives. J Adv Res. 2022; 43:59-71. PMC: 8905887. DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.03.002. View