» Articles » PMID: 37107928

The Use of Cardioprotective Devices and Strategies in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Procedures and Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

In the United States, about one million people are seen to visit the operating theater for cardiac surgery annually. However, nearly half of these visits result in complications such as renal, neurological, and cardiac injury of varying degrees. Historically, many mechanisms and approaches have been explored in attempts to reduce injuries associated with cardiac surgery and percutaneous procedures. Devices such as cardioplegia, mechanical circulatory support, and other methods have shown promising results in managing and preventing life-threatening cardiac-surgery-related outcomes such as heart failure and cardiogenic shock. Comparably, cardioprotective devices such as TandemHeart, Impella family devices, and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) have also been proven to show significant cardioprotection through mechanical support. However, their use as interventional agents in the prevention of hemodynamic changes due to cardiac surgery or percutaneous interventions has been correlated with adverse effects. This can lead to a rebound increased risk of mortality in high-risk patients who undergo cardiac surgery. Further research is necessary to delineate and stratify patients into appropriate cardioprotective device groups. Furthermore, the use of one device over another in terms of efficacy remains controversial and further research is necessary to assess device potential in different settings. Clinical research is also needed regarding novel strategies and targets, such as transcutaneous vagus stimulation and supersaturated oxygen therapy, aimed at reducing mortality among high-risk cardiac surgery patients. This review explores the recent advances regarding the use of cardioprotective devices in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures and cardiac surgery.

References
1.
Zhang A, Rastogi R, Marsh K, Yang B, Wu D, Kron I . Topical Neck Cooling Without Systemic Hypothermia Attenuates Myocardial Ischemic Injury and Post-ischemic Reperfusion Injury. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:893837. PMC: 9274088. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.893837. View

2.
Brewer J, Capoccia M, Maybauer D, Lorusso R, Swol J, Maybauer M . The ProtekDuo dual-lumen cannula for temporary acute mechanical circulatory support in right heart failure: A systematic review. Perfusion. 2023; 38(1_suppl):59-67. DOI: 10.1177/02676591221149859. View

3.
Zhang Q, Han Y, Sun S, Zhang C, Liu H, Wang B . Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: a network meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22(1):48. PMC: 8842943. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02493-0. View

4.
Scarsini R, Terentes-Printzios D, Shanmuganathan M, Kotronias R, Borlotti A, Marin F . Pressure-controlled intermittent coronary sinus occlusion improves the vasodilatory microvascular capacity and reduces myocardial injury in patients with STEMI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 99(2):329-339. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29793. View

5.
Newman M, Mathew J, Grocott H, Mackensen G, Monk T, Welsh-Bohmer K . Central nervous system injury associated with cardiac surgery. Lancet. 2006; 368(9536):694-703. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69254-4. View