» Articles » PMID: 37098933

Obstetric Simulation for Undergraduate Medical Education: How to Improve Students' Self-confidence and Expectation According to Gender

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Apr 26
PMID 37098933
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of obstetric simulation training on undergraduate medical students to improve their self-confidence.

Methods: Fifth-year undergraduate medical students were invited to a 2-week course of simulation in obstetrics during their clerkship. The sessions included were as follows: (1) care for the second and third periods of childbirth, (2) partograph analysis and pelvimetry, (3) premature rupture of membranes at term, and (4) diagnosis and management of third-trimester bleeding. Before the first session and at the end of the training period, a questionnaire about self-confidence in obstetric procedures and skills was applied.

Results: A total of 115 medical students were included, of whom 60 (52.2%) were male and 55 (47.8%) were female. Comparing initial and final scores, the median results of the subscales "comprehension and preparation" (18 vs. 22, p<0.001), "knowledge of procedures" (14 vs. 20, p<0.001), and "expectation" (22 vs. 23, p<0.01) were significantly higher at the end of the training period in all items of the questionnaire than in the beginning. Differences were found based on the students' gender, i.e., female students had a significantly higher sum of scores than the male students in the initial subscale for "expectation" (median, 24 vs. 22, p<0.001) and "interest" (median, 23 vs. 21, p=0.032), and a higher sum of scores in the subscale for "expectation" (median, 23 vs. 21, p=0.010) in the final questionnaire.

Conclusion: Obstetric simulation enhances the improvement of students' self-confidence in understanding both the physiology of childbirth and the obstetric care procedures. Further studies are needed to understand the influence of gender on obstetric care.

Citing Articles

A comparative study of traditional high-fidelity (manikin-based) simulation and virtual high-fidelity simulations concerning their effectiveness and perception.

Salacinska I, Trojnar P, Gebrine K, Toro V, Sarvary A, Wiech P Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1523768.

PMID: 39995686 PMC: 11847899. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1523768.

References
1.
Wang Y, Ji Y . How do they learn: types and characteristics of medical and healthcare student engagement in a simulation-based learning environment. BMC Med Educ. 2021; 21(1):420. PMC: 8349045. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02858-7. View

2.
Monod C, Voekt C, Gisin M, Gisin S, Hoesli I . Optimization of competency in obstetrical emergencies: a role for simulation training. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013; 289(4):733-8. PMC: 3949012. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-013-3111-6. View

3.
Orejuela F, Aschkenazi S, Howard D, Jeppson P, Balgobin S, Walter A . Gynecologic surgical skill acquisition through simulation with outcomes at the time of surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227(1):29.e1-29.e24. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.031. View

4.
Deane R, Murphy D . Proposed learning strategies of medical students in a clinical rotation in obstetrics and gynecology: a descriptive study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016; 7:489-96. PMC: 4986684. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S108008. View

5.
van de Ven J, van Baaren G, Fransen A, van Runnard Heimel P, Mol B, Oei S . Cost-effectiveness of simulation-based team training in obstetric emergencies (TOSTI study). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 216:130-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.027. View