» Articles » PMID: 34362346

How Do They Learn: Types and Characteristics of Medical and Healthcare Student Engagement in a Simulation-based Learning Environment

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2021 Aug 7
PMID 34362346
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Student engagement can predict successful learning outcomes and academic development. The expansion of simulation-based medical and healthcare education creates challenges for educators, as they must help students engage in a simulation-based learning environment. This research provides a reference for facilitators of simulation teaching and student learning in medical and health-related majors by providing a deep understanding of student engagement in a simulation-based learning environment.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with ten medical and healthcare students to explore their learning types and characteristics in a simulation-based learning environment. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.

Results: The interviews were thematically analysed to identify three types of student engagement in the simulation-based learning environment: reflective engagement, performance engagement, and interactive engagement. The analysis also identified eight sub-themes: active, persistent, and focused thinking engagement; self-directed-learning thinking engagement with the purpose of problem solving; active "voice" in class; strong emotional experience and disclosure; demonstration of professional leadership; interaction with realistic learning situations; support from teammates; and collegial facilitator-student interaction.

Conclusions: The student interview and thematic analysis methods can be used to study the richness of student engagement in simulation-based learning environments. This study finds that student engagement in a simulation-based learning environment is different from that in a traditional environment, as it places greater emphasis on performance engagement, which combines both thinking and physical engagement, as well as on interactive engagement as generated through interpersonal interactions. Therefore, we suggest expanding the learning space centring around "inquiry", as it can help strengthen reflective communication and dialogue. It also facilitates imagination, stimulates empathy, and builds an interprofessional learning community. In this way, medical and healthcare students can learn through the two-way transmission of information and cultivate and reshape interpersonal relationships to improve engagement in a simulation-based learning environment.

Citing Articles

Interactive Engagement with Self-Paced Learning Content in a Didactic Course.

Sharmin N, Houshyar S, Stevenson T, Chow A Healthc Inform Res. 2025; 31(1):96-106.

PMID: 39973040 PMC: 11854625. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.96.


Which psychological needs profile exhibits higher engagement and favorable attitudes toward interprofessional education? A cluster analysis among health and social care Hong Kong students.

Dizon J, He Q, Shen X, Luk P, Chong D, Chan K BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1508.

PMID: 39707298 PMC: 11662416. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06507-7.


From technique mastery to scientific thinking: how open-ended experiments shape medical students' perception of laboratory course roles in China.

Lu Q, Dou H, Shen S BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1488.

PMID: 39696313 PMC: 11657453. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06325-x.


The evolution of medical education in the era of Covid-19 and beyond: a longitudinal study.

Zhao Y, Sun T, Zhang X, Wang X, Hu W BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1289.

PMID: 39529071 PMC: 11555806. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06271-8.


The impact of the educational environment on student engagement and academic performance in health professions education.

Kassab S, Rathan R, Taylor D, Hamdy H BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1278.

PMID: 39511668 PMC: 11545942. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06270-9.


References
1.
Al-Elq A . Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Family Community Med. 2011; 17(1):35-40. PMC: 3195067. DOI: 10.4103/1319-1683.68787. View

2.
Kim K, Hwang J . Ubiquitous testing using tablets: its impact on medical student perceptions of and engagement in learning. Korean J Med Educ. 2016; 28(1):57-66. PMC: 4926942. DOI: 10.3946/kjme.2016.10. View

3.
Roh Y, Jang K . Survey of factors influencing learner engagement with simulation debriefing among nursing students. Nurs Health Sci. 2017; 19(4):485-491. DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12371. View

4.
Nanji K, Baca K, Raemer D . The effect of an olfactory and visual cue on realism and engagement in a health care simulation experience. Simul Healthc. 2013; 8(3):143-7. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827d27f9. View

5.
Reid H, Thomson C, McGlade K . Content and discontent: a qualitative exploration of obstacles to elearning engagement in medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2016; 16:188. PMC: 4957903. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0710-5. View