» Articles » PMID: 37096571

Melanoma Risk Prediction Based on a Polygenic Risk Score and Clinical Risk Factors

Overview
Journal Melanoma Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Apr 25
PMID 37096571
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Melanoma is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the Western world: third in Australia, fifth in the USA and sixth in the European Union. Predicting an individual's personal risk of developing melanoma may aid them in undertaking effective risk reduction measures. The objective of this study was to use the UK Biobank to predict the 10-year risk of melanoma using a newly developed polygenic risk score (PRS) and an existing clinical risk model. We developed the PRS using a matched case-control training dataset ( N  = 16 434) in which age and sex were controlled by design. The combined risk score was developed using a cohort development dataset ( N  = 54 799) and its performance was tested using a cohort testing dataset ( N  = 54 798). Our PRS comprises 68 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.639 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.618-0.661]. In the cohort testing data, the hazard ratio per SD of the combined risk score was 1.332 (95% CI = 1.263-1.406). Harrell's C-index was 0.685 (95% CI = 0.654-0.715). Overall, the standardized incidence ratio was 1.193 (95% CI = 1.067-1.335). By combining a PRS and a clinical risk score, we have developed a risk prediction model that performs well in terms of discrimination and calibration. At an individual level, information on the 10-year risk of melanoma can motivate people to take risk-reduction action. At the population level, risk stratification can allow more effective population-level screening strategies to be implemented.

Citing Articles

Polygenic Risk Score Improves Melanoma Risk Assessment in a Patient Cohort from the Veneto Region of Italy.

Pellegrini S, Potjer T, Del Bianco P, Vecchiato A, Fabozzi A, Piccin L Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 39596909 PMC: 11592222. DOI: 10.3390/biology13110954.


Targeted Screening for Cancer: Learnings and Applicability to Melanoma: A Scoping Review.

Zheng L, Smit A, Cust A, Janda M J Pers Med. 2024; 14(8).

PMID: 39202054 PMC: 11355139. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14080863.


The potential impact of dietary choices on melanoma risk: an anti-inflammatory diet.

Fortes C, Mastroeni S, Levati L, Alotto M, Ricci F, DAtri S Genes Nutr. 2024; 19(1):9.

PMID: 38783228 PMC: 11119307. DOI: 10.1186/s12263-024-00745-6.

References
1.
Mahendraraj K, Sidhu K, Lau C, McRoy G, Chamberlain R, Smith F . Malignant Melanoma in African-Americans: A Population-Based Clinical Outcomes Study Involving 1106 African-American Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) Database (1988-2011). Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(15):e6258. PMC: 5403065. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006258. View

2.
Ford D, Bliss J, Swerdlow A, Armstrong B, Franceschi S, Green A . Risk of cutaneous melanoma associated with a family history of the disease. The International Melanoma Analysis Group (IMAGE). Int J Cancer. 1995; 62(4):377-81. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910620403. View

3.
Vuong K, Armstrong B, Weiderpass E, Lund E, Adami H, Veierod M . Development and External Validation of a Melanoma Risk Prediction Model Based on Self-assessed Risk Factors. JAMA Dermatol. 2016; 152(8):889-96. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0939. View

4.
Usher-Smith J, Emery J, Kassianos A, Walter F . Risk prediction models for melanoma: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014; 23(8):1450-63. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0295. View

5.
Marsden J, Newton-Bishop J, Burrows L, Cook M, Corrie P, Cox N . Revised UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma 2010. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63(9):1401-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.07.006. View