» Articles » PMID: 37096305

Methodology for Computed Tomography Characterization of Commercially Available 3D Printing Materials for Use in Radiology/radiation Oncology

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 25
PMID 37096305
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

3D printing in medical physics provides opportunities for creating patient-specific treatment devices and in-house fabrication of imaging/dosimetry phantoms. This study characterizes several commercial fused deposition 3D printing materials with some containing nonstandard compositions. It is important to explore their similarities to human tissues and other materials encountered in patients. Uniform cylinders with infill from 50 to 100% at six evenly distributed intervals were printed using 13 different filaments. A novel approach rotating infill angle 10 between each layer avoids unwanted patterns. Five materials contained high-Z/metallic components. A clinical CT scanner with a range of tube potentials (70, 80, 100, 120, 140 kVp) was used. Density and average Hounsfield unit (HU) were measured. A commercial GAMMEX phantom mimicking various human tissues provides a comparison. Utility of the lookup tables produced is demonstrated. A methodology for calibrating print materials/parameters for a desired HU is presented. Density and HU were determined for all materials as a function of tube voltage (kVp) and infill percentage. The range of HU (-732.0-10047.4 HU) and physical densities (0.36-3.52 g/cm ) encompassed most tissues/materials encountered in radiology/radiotherapy applications with many overlapping those of human tissues. Printing filaments doped with high-Z materials demonstrated increased attenuation due to the photoelectric effect with decreased kVp, as found in certain endogenous materials (e.g., bone). HU was faithfully reproduced (within one standard deviation) in a 3D-printed mimic of a commercial anthropomorphic phantom section. Characterization of commercially available 3D print materials facilitates custom object fabrication for use in radiology and radiation oncology, including human tissue and common exogenous implant mimics. This allows for cost reduction and increased flexibility to fabricate novel phantoms or patient-specific devices imaging and dosimetry purposes. A formalism for calibrating to specific CT scanner, printer, and filament type/batch is presented. Utility is demonstrated by printing a commercial anthropomorphic phantom copy.

Citing Articles

PA12 Surface Treatment and Its Effect on Compatibility with Nutritional Culture Medium to Maintain Cell Vitality and Proliferation.

Ferencik N, Danko M, Nadova Z, Kolembusova P, Steingartner W Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790309 PMC: 11118206. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050442.


Methodology for computed tomography characterization of commercially available 3D printing materials for use in radiology/radiation oncology.

Kozee M, Weygand J, Andreozzi J, Hunt D, Perez B, Graham J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(6):e13999.

PMID: 37096305 PMC: 10243336. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13999.

References
1.
Kunert P, Trinkl S, Giussani A, Reichert D, Brix G . Tissue equivalence of 3D printing materials with respect to attenuation and absorption of X-rays used for diagnostic and interventional imaging. Med Phys. 2022; 49(12):7766-7778. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15987. View

2.
Chae R, Sharon J, Kournoutas I, Ovunc S, Wang M, Abla A . Replicating Skull Base Anatomy With 3D Technologies: A Comparative Study Using 3D-scanned and 3D-printed Models of the Temporal Bone. Otol Neurotol. 2019; 41(3):e392-e403. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002524. View

3.
Tino R, Yeo A, Brandt M, Leary M, Kron T . A customizable anthropomorphic phantom for dosimetric verification of 3D-printed lung, tissue, and bone density materials. Med Phys. 2021; 49(1):52-69. DOI: 10.1002/mp.15364. View

4.
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J, Pujol S . 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 30(9):1323-41. PMC: 3466397. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001. View

5.
Ma D, Gao R, Li M, Qiu J . Mechanical and medical imaging properties of 3D-printed materials as tissue equivalent materials. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 23(2):e13495. PMC: 8833282. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13495. View