» Articles » PMID: 37093239

Exploring Barriers and Opportunities to Improve Osteoporosis Care Across the Acute-to-primary Care Interface: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37093239
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Fracture liaison services (FLS) can be effective for secondary fracture prevention, but long-term adherence to therapies remains suboptimal. Few studies have explored how services manage the transition between tertiary and primary post-fracture care. This study mapped service processes and factors influencing integration of post-clinic care, identifying barriers, supports, and opportunities for seamless healthcare.

Methods: Qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with FLS stakeholders at two metropolitan hospitals in New South Wales (NSW) and surrounding general practices.

Results: Seven FLS clinicians, 11 general practitioners (GPs), and seven patients were interviewed. Six key themes emerged on the transition of patient care from tertiary to primary care (PC). Interprofessional communication issues and role ambiguity posed threats to seamless care. Delayed, absent, inaccessible, or poor-quality communication frustrated GPs, while FLS clinicians lacked confidence in existing communication systems and desired bidirectional communication with PC. GPs were confident managing osteoporosis, but FLS clinicians had limited confidence that patients would discuss osteoporosis with their GP and that GPs would action recommendations. Effective PC follow-up required a positive GP-patient relationship and that patients perceived a need to engage with PC. Patient understanding of osteoporosis (influenced by patient education, knowledge, beliefs, and health behaviours) affected PC attendance. Limited public awareness of osteoporosis and healthcare policy deficits contributed to care gaps.

Conclusion: Key challenges were identified facing stakeholders seeking to improving post-clinic osteoporosis care. Development and implementation of local, integrated acute-community policies and care pathways as an initial intervention may address information and service delivery issues across the acute-PC divide.

Citing Articles

Integrated model of secondary fracture prevention in primary care (INTERCEPT): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled multicentre trial.

Wang M, Knight A, Demeshko A, Girgis C, Bolton P, Das A BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):349.

PMID: 39342106 PMC: 11438153. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02601-3.


Perspectives of healthcare providers on osteoporosis, falls and fracture risk: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Cho C, Bak G, Sumpton D, Richards B, Sherrington C Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):90.

PMID: 39313605 PMC: 11420259. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01446-8.


Development of self-administered questionnaire on barriers, prescription practices, and guideline adherence of osteoporosis management among tertiary care clinicians: content validity and reliability analysis.

Muhamad Jamil N, Naina Mohamed I, Mokhtar S, Leong J, Kamudin N, Muhammad N Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1393500.

PMID: 39309106 PMC: 11412838. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1393500.


Secondary fracture prevention in primary care: a narrative review.

Wang M, Seibel M Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(8):1359-1376.

PMID: 38652313 PMC: 11281980. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07036-1.


Establishing consensus recommendations for long-term osteoporosis care for patients who have attended an Australian fracture liaison service: a Delphi study.

Bennett M, Center J, Perry L Osteoporos Int. 2024; 35(3):373-389.

PMID: 38267665 PMC: 10867051. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07014-7.


References
1.
Ganda K, Puech M, Chen J, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center J . Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 24(2):393-406. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2090-y. View

2.
Klotzbuecher C, Ross P, Landsman P, Abbott 3rd T, Berger M . Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000; 15(4):721-39. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.4.721. View

3.
Naranjo A, Molina A, Quevedo A, Rubino F, Sanchez-Alonso F, Rodriguez-Lozano C . Long-term persistence of treatment after hip fracture in a fracture liaison service. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9373. PMC: 9174234. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13465-x. View

4.
Markiewicz O, Lavelle M, Lorencatto F, Judah G, Ashrafian H, Darzi A . Threats to safe transitions from hospital to home: a consensus study in North West London primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2019; 70(690):e9-e19. PMC: 6917362. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X707105. View

5.
Drew S, Judge A, Cooper C, Javaid M, Farmer A, Gooberman-Hill R . Secondary prevention of fractures after hip fracture: a qualitative study of effective service delivery. Osteoporos Int. 2016; 27(5):1719-27. PMC: 4839047. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3452-z. View