» Articles » PMID: 34657598

The Global Prevalence of Osteoporosis in the World: a Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2021 Oct 18
PMID 34657598
Citations 268
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis affects all sections of society, including families with people affected by osteoporosis, government agencies and medical institutes in various fields. For example, it involves the patient and his/her family members, and government agencies in terms of the cost of treatment and medical care. Providing a comprehensive picture of the prevalence of osteoporosis globally is important for health policymakers to make appropriate decisions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis worldwide.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA criteria. The PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, Magiran, and Google Scholar databases were searched with no lower time limit up till 26 August 2020. The heterogeneity of the studies was measured using the I test, and the publication bias was assessed by the Begg and Mazumdar's test at the significance level of 0.1.

Results: After following the systematic review processes, 86 studies were selected for meta-analysis. The sample size of the study was 103,334,579 people in the age range of 15-105 years. Using meta-analysis, the prevalence of osteoporosis in the world was reported to be 18.3 (95% CI 16.2-20.7). Based on 70 studies and sample size of 800,457 women, and heterogenicity I: 99.8, the prevalence of osteoporosis in women of the world was reported to be 23.1 (95% CI 19.8-26.9), while the prevalence of osteoporosis among men of the world was found to be 11.7 (95% CI 9.6-14.1 which was based on 40 studies and sample size of 453,964 men.). The highest prevalence of osteoporosis was reported in Africa with 39.5% (95% CI 22.3-59.7) and a sample size of 2989 people with the age range 18-95 years.

Conclusion: According to the medical, economic, and social burden of osteoporosis, providing a robust and comprehensive estimate of the prevalence of osteoporosis in the world can facilitate decisions in health system planning and policymaking, including an overview of the current and outlook for the future; provide the necessary facilities for the treatment of people with osteoporosis; reduce the severe risks that lead to death by preventing fractures; and, finally, monitor the overall state of osteoporosis in the world. This study is the first to report a structured review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of osteoporosis worldwide.

Citing Articles

Vitamin D and calcium supplementation in women undergoing pharmacological management for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a level I of evidence systematic review.

Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Colarossi G, Filippelli A, Memminger M, Conti V Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):170.

PMID: 40087804 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-02412-x.


Association between dietary protein intake and bone mineral density based on NHANES 2011-2018.

Chen X, Fu Y, Zhu Z Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8638.

PMID: 40082692 PMC: 11906839. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-93642-w.


Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry-A Novel Tool in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis and Prediction of Fragility Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Icatoiu E, Vladulescu-Trandafir A, Groseanu L, Berghea F, Cobilinschi C, Potcovaru C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075802 PMC: 11898608. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050555.


Calcaneal Ultrasound Attenuation: Does the Region of Interest and Loading Influence the Repeatability of Measurement?.

Robertson A, Jones B, Langton C, Wearing S Calcif Tissue Int. 2025; 116(1):48.

PMID: 40063094 PMC: 11893676. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-025-01357-x.


Physical activity and ageing: The role of physiotherapy in promoting healthy ageing.

Naidoo S, Naidoo N S Afr J Physiother. 2025; 81(1):2114.

PMID: 40061855 PMC: 11886570. DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v81i1.2114.


References
1.
Agrawal N, Sharma B . Prevalence of osteoporosis in otherwise healthy Indian males aged 50 years and above. Arch Osteoporos. 2013; 8:116. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-012-0116-x. View

2.
Kazeminia M, Abdi A, Shohaimi S, Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Salari N . Dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children's worldwide, 1995 to 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Face Med. 2020; 16(1):22. PMC: 7541284. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-020-00237-z. View

3.
Park S, Kim J, Jeong J, Lee J, Chin D, Chung C . Prevalence and Incidence of Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture in Korea: Nationwide Epidemiological Study Focusing on Differences in Socioeconomic Status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(4):328-36. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001291. View

4.
Fatima M, Nawaz H, Rehman R, Kasi P, Kassi M, Afghan A . Determining the risk factors and prevalence of osteoporosis using quantitative ultrasonography in Pakistani adult women. Singapore Med J. 2009; 50(1):20-8. View

5.
Mithal A, Kaur P . Osteoporosis in Asia: a call to action. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2012; 10(4):245-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-012-0114-3. View