» Articles » PMID: 37093075

Benchmarking: a Novel Measuring Tool for Outcome Comparisons in Surgery

Overview
Journal Int J Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37093075
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Benchmarking, a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons, is a recent concept in surgery. The objectives of this review are to examine the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking and its application in surgery.

Methods: The literature about benchmarking was reviewed through an ever-narrowing search strategy, commencing from the concept, definition, and evolution of benchmarking to the application of benchmarking and experiences of benchmarking in surgery. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched until 20 September 2022, in the English language according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

Results: In the first phase of the literature search, the development of benchmarking was identified. The definitions of benchmarking evolved from a surveying term to a novel quality-improvement tool to assess the best achievable results in surgery. In the second phase, a total of 23 studies were identified about benchmarking in surgery, including esophagectomy, hepatic surgery, pancreatic surgery, rectum resection, and bariatric surgery. All studies were multicenter analyses from national, international, or global expert centers. Most studies (87.0%) adopted the definition that benchmark was the 75th percentile of the median values of centers. Performance metrics to define benchmarks were clinically relevant intraoperative and postoperative outcome indicators.

Conclusion: Benchmarking in surgery is a novel quality-improvement tool to define and measure the best achievable results, establishing a meaningful reference to evaluate surgical performance.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the SwedeAmp database: Focus on coverage and amputation level rates.

Johannesson A, Scheving R, Westlund K, Fridriksson T Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2025; 7(2):44089.

PMID: 39990240 PMC: 11844758. DOI: 10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44089.


Recommendations for the implementation and conduct of multidisciplinary team meetings for those providing endometriosis and adenomyosis care - a Delphi consensus of the European Endometriosis League (EEL).

Burla L, Kalaitzopoulos D, Samartzis N, Khazali S, Bokor A, Renner S Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024; 16(3):337-350.

PMID: 39357865 PMC: 11569442. DOI: 10.52054/FVVO.16.3.038.

References
1.
Clavien P, Puhan M . Measuring and achieving the best possible outcomes in surgery. Br J Surg. 2017; 104(9):1121-1122. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10569. View

2.
Gero D, Vannijvel M, Okkema S, Deleus E, Lloyd A, Lo Menzo E . Defining Global Benchmarks in Elective Secondary Bariatric Surgery Comprising Conversional, Revisional, and Reversal Procedures. Ann Surg. 2021; 274(5):821-828. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005117. View

3.
Staiger R, Rossler F, Kim M, Brown C, Trenti L, Sasaki T . Benchmarks in colorectal surgery: multinational study to define quality thresholds in high and low anterior resection. Br J Surg. 2022; 109(12):1274-1281. DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac300. View

4.
Staiger R, Schwandt H, Puhan M, Clavien P . Improving surgical outcomes through benchmarking. Br J Surg. 2018; 106(1):59-64. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10976. View

5.
Ettorchi-Tardy A, Levif M, Michel P . Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health. Healthc Policy. 2013; 7(4):e101-19. PMC: 3359088. View