» Articles » PMID: 28486288

The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®): Added Value and Clinical Perspectives 3 Years "Down the Line"

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2017 May 10
PMID 28486288
Citations 84
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To explore the added value of the comprehensive complication index (CCI) to standard assessment of postoperative morbidity, and to clarify potential controversies for its application.

Background: The CCI was introduced about 3 years ago as a novel metric of postoperative morbidity, integrating in a single formula all complications by severity, ranging from 0 (uneventful course) to 100 (death). It remains unclear, how often the CCI adds to standard reporting of complications and how to apply it in complex postoperative courses.

Methods: CCI data were prospectively collected over a 1-year period at our institution. The proportion of patients with more than 1 complication and the severity of those complications were assessed to determine the additional value of the CCI compared to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Complex and controversial cases were presented to 90 surgeons worldwide to achieve consensus in weighing each postoperative event. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate agreement among surgeons and to suggest solutions for consistent use of the CCI.

Results: Complications were identified in 24% (290/1212) of the general surgical population. Of those, 44% (127/290) developed more than 1 complication by the time of discharge, and thereby CCI added information to the standard grading system of complications. Information gained by the CCI increased with the complexity of surgery and observation time.

Conclusions: The CCI adds information on postoperative morbidity in almost half of the patients developing complications, with particular value following extensive surgery and longer postoperative observation up to 3 months. Each single complication, independently of their inter-connection, should be included in the CCI calculation to best mirror the patients' postoperative morbidity.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Analysis.

Doniz Gomez Llanos D, Leal Hidalgo C, Arechavala Lopez S, Padilla Flores A, Correa Rovelo J, Athie Athie A Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e79647.

PMID: 40008105 PMC: 11857925. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.79647.


Assessing the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring compared with conventional monitoring in enhancing surgical outcomes for patients with diabetes: protocol for a multicentre, parallel-arm, randomised, pragmatic trial in China.

Duan Y, Ding L, Gao Z, Wang Y, Cao H, Zhang H BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e090664.

PMID: 39965943 PMC: 11836829. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090664.


Prediction Tools in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Jadresic M, Baker J Spine Surg Relat Res. 2025; 9(1):1-10.

PMID: 39935977 PMC: 11808232. DOI: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0189.


Association Between Reconstruction Technique and Clinical Outcomes in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Proximal Gastrectomy.

Sedlak K, Rawicz-Pruszynski K, Pelc Z, Mlak R, Geca K, Skorzewska M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766179 PMC: 11674166. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244282.


The Burden of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Readmission Rates and Complications, a Twenty-Year Analysis.

Berchtold C, Huebel K, Roessler F, Graf N, Dutkowski P, Lehmann K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685934 PMC: 11642097. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237477.