» Articles » PMID: 37091825

A Wearable Real-time Kinematic and Kinetic Measurement Sensor Setup for Human Locomotion

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37091825
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current laboratory-based setups (optical marker cameras + force plates) for human motion measurement require participants to stay in a constrained capture region which forbids rich movement types. This study established a fully wearable system, based on commercially available sensors (inertial measurement units + pressure insoles) that can measure both kinematic and kinetic motion data simultaneously and support wireless frame-by-frame streaming. In addition, its capability and accuracy were tested against a conventional laboratory-based setup. An experiment was conducted, with 9 participants wearing the wearable measurement system and performing 13 daily motion activities, from slow walking to fast running, together with vertical jump, squat, lunge and single-leg landing, inside the capture space of the laboratory-based motion capture system. The recorded sensor data were post-processed to obtain joint angles, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and joint torques (via multi-body inverse dynamics). Compared to the laboratory-based system, the established wearable measurement system can measure accurate information of all lower limb joint angles (Pearson's r = 0.929), vertical GRFs (Pearson's r = 0.954), and ankle joint torques (Pearson's r = 0.917). Center of pressure (CoP) in the anterior-posterior direction and knee joint torques were fairly matched (Pearson's r = 0.683 and 0.612, respectively). Calculated hip joint torques and measured medial-lateral CoP did not match with the laboratory-based system (Pearson's r = 0.21 and 0.47, respectively). Furthermore, both raw and processed datasets are openly accessible (). Documentation, data processing codes, and guidelines to establish the real-time wearable kinetic measurement system are also shared (https://github.com/HuaweiWang/WearableMeasurementSystem).

Citing Articles

Recent Innovations in Footwear and the Role of Smart Footwear in Healthcare-A Survey.

Rukmini P, Hegde R, Basavarajappa B, Bhat A, Pujari A, Gargiulo G Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(13).

PMID: 39001080 PMC: 11243832. DOI: 10.3390/s24134301.


Estimating 3D kinematics and kinetics from virtual inertial sensor data through musculoskeletal movement simulations.

Nitschke M, Dorschky E, Leyendecker S, Eskofier B, Koelewijn A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1285845.

PMID: 38628437 PMC: 11018991. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1285845.


Improving Biological Joint Moment Estimation During Real-World Tasks With EMG and Instrumented Insoles.

Scherpereel K, Molinaro D, Shepherd M, Inan O, Young A IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2024; 71(9):2718-2727.

PMID: 38619965 PMC: 11364170. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2024.3388874.

References
1.
Matijevich E, Scott L, Volgyesi P, Derry K, Zelik K . Combining wearable sensor signals, machine learning and biomechanics to estimate tibial bone force and damage during running. Hum Mov Sci. 2020; 74:102690. PMC: 9827619. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2020.102690. View

2.
Jung Y, Jung M, Lee K, Koo S . Ground reaction force estimation using an insole-type pressure mat and joint kinematics during walking. J Biomech. 2014; 47(11):2693-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05.007. View

3.
Hewett T, Myer G, Ford K, Heidt Jr R, Colosimo A, McLean S . Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(4):492-501. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504269591. View

4.
Novacheck . The biomechanics of running. Gait Posture. 1999; 7(1):77-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(97)00038-6. View

5.
Pizzolato C, Reggiani M, Modenese L, Lloyd D . Real-time inverse kinematics and inverse dynamics for lower limb applications using OpenSim. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2016; 20(4):436-445. PMC: 5550294. DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2016.1240789. View