» Articles » PMID: 37089224

A Multistep Science Literacy Training Framework in an Introductory Biology Classroom: Teaching How to Find, Evaluate, Comprehend, and Cite Scientific Evidence

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Apr 24
PMID 37089224
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Today's undergraduates are tomorrow's decision makers. Many of these decisions in biological sciences can influence whether the vaccines for the next pandemic will be effective, whether the mitigation efforts will have any impact on climate change, or whether we can produce enough food for the rapidly increasing human population while fighting the next pest outbreak. These informed decisions will need to be made by scientifically literate humans, including health professionals, politicians, and media personalities, who are currently undergraduates in our courses. Students in introductory biology classes can build a strong science literacy foundation by learning how to find, evaluate, read, discuss, and cite scientific evidence. An interconnected, multistep framework that uses library guides, active learning methods, group discussions, and collaborative learning is being used for nearly a decade in Investigative Biology and has been shown to significantly improve students' perceived science literacy and science communication skills. In this article, we share basic guidelines about how to implement this framework in one long laboratory session or in consecutive lectures. The flow of the proposed exercises has been tested and adjusted based on students' feedback and the authors' experiences, and a wide variety of resources are being shared to help the successful implementation of this framework in courses that would like to train the next generation of science-literate biologists.

Citing Articles

Demographic isolation and attitudes toward group work in student-selected lab groups.

Asgari M, Cardace A, Sarvary M PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310918.

PMID: 39316619 PMC: 11421786. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310918.


Developing Science Literacy in Students and Society: Theory, Research, and Practice.

Kelp N, McCartney M, Sarvary M, Shaffer J, Wolyniak M J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023; 24(2).

PMID: 37614885 PMC: 10443302. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00058-23.

References
1.
Sarvary M, Gifford K . The Benefits of a Real-Time Web-Based Response System for Enhancing Engaged Learning in Classrooms and Public Science Events. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2017; 15(2):E13-E16. PMC: 5480850. View

2.
Cooper K, Schinske J, Tanner K . Reconsidering the Share of a Think-Pair-Share: Emerging Limitations, Alternatives, and Opportunities for Research. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2021; 20(1):fe1. PMC: 8108495. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.20-08-0200. View

3.
Castelli F, Sarvary M . Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(8):3565-3576. PMC: 8057329. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7123. View

4.
Sarvary M, Castelli F, Asgari M . Undergraduates' Experiences with Online and in-Person Courses Provide Opportunities for Improving Student-Centered Biology Laboratory Instruction. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022; 23(1). PMC: 9053021. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00289-21. View