» Articles » PMID: 37085524

Unsupervised Approach to Decomposing Neural Tuning Variability

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Apr 21
PMID 37085524
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neural representation is often described by the tuning curves of individual neurons with respect to certain stimulus variables. Despite this tradition, it has become increasingly clear that neural tuning can vary substantially in accordance with a collection of internal and external factors. A challenge we are facing is the lack of appropriate methods to accurately capture the moment-to-moment tuning variability directly from the noisy neural responses. Here we introduce an unsupervised statistical approach, Poisson functional principal component analysis (Pf-PCA), which identifies different sources of systematic tuning fluctuations, moreover encompassing several current models (e.g.,multiplicative gain models) as special cases. Applying this method to neural data recorded from macaque primary visual cortex- a paradigmatic case for which the tuning curve approach has been scientifically essential- we discovered a simple relationship governing the variability of orientation tuning, which unifies different types of gain changes proposed previously. By decomposing the neural tuning variability into interpretable components, our method enables discovery of unexpected structure of the neural code, capturing the influence of the external stimulus drive and internal states simultaneously.

Citing Articles

Circuit-motivated generalized affine models characterize stimulus-dependent visual cortical shared variability.

Xia J, Jasper A, Kohn A, Miller K iScience. 2024; 27(8):110512.

PMID: 39156642 PMC: 11328009. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110512.


Interpretable deep learning for deconvolutional analysis of neural signals.

Tolooshams B, Matias S, Wu H, Temereanca S, Uchida N, Murthy V bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38260512 PMC: 10802267. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.05.574379.


Phantom oscillations in principal component analysis.

Shinn M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(48):e2311420120.

PMID: 37988465 PMC: 10691246. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2311420120.

References
1.
Zoltowski D, Latimer K, Yates J, Huk A, Pillow J . Discrete Stepping and Nonlinear Ramping Dynamics Underlie Spiking Responses of LIP Neurons during Decision-Making. Neuron. 2019; 102(6):1249-1258.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.031. View

2.
Kenet T, Bibitchkov D, Tsodyks M, Grinvald A, Arieli A . Spontaneously emerging cortical representations of visual attributes. Nature. 2003; 425(6961):954-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature02078. View

3.
Holt G, Koch C . Shunting inhibition does not have a divisive effect on firing rates. Neural Comput. 1997; 9(5):1001-13. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.5.1001. View

4.
Cumming B, Nienborg H . Feedforward and feedback sources of choice probability in neural population responses. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016; 37:126-132. PMC: 4927695. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.009. View

5.
Charles A, Park M, Weller J, Horwitz G, Pillow J . Dethroning the Fano Factor: A Flexible, Model-Based Approach to Partitioning Neural Variability. Neural Comput. 2018; 30(4):1012-1045. PMC: 6558056. DOI: 10.1162/neco_a_01062. View