» Articles » PMID: 37070542

Susceptibility to 3BNC117 and 10-1074 in ART Suppressed Chronically Infected Persons

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the susceptibility of HIV to two HIV monoclonal antibodies (bnAbs), 3BNC117 and 10-1074, in individuals with chronically antiretroviral therapy (ART) suppressed HIV infection.

Design: The susceptibility of bnAbs was determined using the PhenoSense mAb Assay, which is a cell-based infectivity assay designed to assess the susceptibility of luciferase-reporter pseudovirions. This assay is the only Clinical Laboratory Improvement Ammendment (CLIA)/College of American Pathologist (CAP) compliant screening test specifically developed for evaluating bnAb susceptibility in people with HIV infection.

Method: The susceptibility of luciferase-reporter pseudovirions, derived from HIV-1 envelope proteins obtained from peripheral bloodmononuclear cells of 61 ART-suppressed individuals, to 3BNC117 and 10-1074 bnAbs was assessed using the PhenoSense mAb assay. Susceptibility was defined as an IC 90 of <2.0 μg/ml and 1.5 μg/ml for 3BNC117 and 10-1074, respectively.

Results: About half of the individuals who were chronically infected and virologically suppressed were found to harbor virus with reduced susceptibility to one or both of the tested bnAbs.

Conclusions: The reduced combined susceptibility of 3BNC117 and 10-1074 highlights a potential limitation of using only two bnAbs for pre-exposure prophylaxis or treatment. Further studies are needed to define and validate the clinical correlates of bnAb susceptibility.

Citing Articles

Current methods for detecting and assessing HIV-1 antibody resistance.

Odidika S, Pirkl M, Lengauer T, Schommers P Front Immunol. 2025; 15():1443377.

PMID: 39835119 PMC: 11743526. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1443377.


Evaluation and Real-world Experience of a Neutralization Susceptibility Screening Assay for Broadly Neutralizing Anti-HIV-1 Antibodies.

Pahus M, Zheng Y, Olefsky M, Gunst J, Tebas P, Taiwo B J Infect Dis. 2024; 231(2):424-434.

PMID: 39441137 PMC: 11841631. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiae486.


To prescreen or not to prescreen for broadly neutralizing antibody sensitivity in HIV cure-related trials.

Patel H, Dube K J Virus Erad. 2023; 9(3):100339.

PMID: 37692548 PMC: 10491646. DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2023.100339.

References
1.
Moldt B, Parvangada A, Martin R, Pace C, Balakrishnan M, Thomsen N . Evaluation of Broadly Neutralizing Antibody Sensitivity by Genotyping and Phenotyping for Qualifying Participants to HIV Clinical Trials. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021; 88(1):61-69. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002722. View

2.
Swindells S, Andrade-Villanueva J, Richmond G, Rizzardini G, Baumgarten A, Masia M . Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine for Maintenance of HIV-1 Suppression. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(12):1112-1123. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1904398. View

3.
Richman D, Wrin T, Little S, Petropoulos C . Rapid evolution of the neutralizing antibody response to HIV type 1 infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(7):4144-9. PMC: 153062. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0630530100. View

4.
McCoy L . The expanding array of HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies. Retrovirology. 2018; 15(1):70. PMC: 6192334. DOI: 10.1186/s12977-018-0453-y. View

5.
Riddler S, Zheng L, Durand C, Ritz J, Koup R, Ledgerwood J . Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Impact of the Broadly Neutralizing HIV-1 Monoclonal Antibody VRC01 on HIV-1 Persistence in Individuals on Effective ART. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018; 5(10):ofy242. PMC: 6195652. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy242. View