» Articles » PMID: 37067765

The Absence of Real-time Pulmonary Vein Isolation During Cryoballoon Ablation is Associated with Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Pulmonary Vein Reconnection : Insights from the Middelheim-PVI Registry 2

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Apr 17
PMID 37067765
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Absence of real-time pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) occurring in 15-40% of PVs during cryoballoon ablation (CBA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) raises doubt about adequate PVI. Aim of the present study is to determine whether real-time PVI during CBA is predictive of long-term clinical outcome and durability of PVI.

Methods: Eight hundred three AF patients (64 ± 10 years, 68% males) undergoing CBA were studied. The cohort was divided in 4 groups according to the number of PVs without real-time PVI: none (N = 252 [31.4%]), 1 (N = 255 [31.8%]), 2 (N = 159 [19.8%]), and 3-4 (N = 137 [17.1]).

Results: At 3 years, 279 (34.7%) patients had recurrence of AF of which 188 underwent repeat ablation. A vein without real-time PVI was associated with AF recurrence (HR = 1.275; 95% CI 1.134-1.433; p < 0.01), independent of persistent AF type (HR = 2.075; 95% CI 1.584-2.738; p < 0.01), left atrial diameter (HR = 1.050; 95% CI 1.028-1.072; p < 0.01), and diagnosis-to-ablation time (HR = 1.002; 95% CI 1.000-1.005; p = 0.04). Highest success was achieved with present real-time PVI in all veins (77.4%), gradually decreasing per increasing number of absent real-time PVI: 66.3% for 1 vein, 58.5% for 2, and 48.9% for 3-4 veins (p < 0.001). At repeat ablation (N = 188), PV reconnection was seen in 99/430 (23.0%) versus 83/288 (28.8%) veins with and without real-time PVI, respectively (p = 0.08). Right inferior PVs (RIPVs) with real-time PVI were less reconnected than RIPVs without real-time PVI: 29.7% versus 43.7% (p = 0.047).

Conclusion: The absence of real-time PVI during CBA independently predicts AF recurrence with a 30% gradual decrease in outcome per increase in veins without real-time PVI. Real-time PVI is particularly important for the RIPV to achieve durable PVI.

Citing Articles

Validation of a machine learning algorithm to identify pulmonary vein isolation during ablation procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of the PVISION study.

De Pooter J, Timmers L, Boveda S, Combes S, Knecht S, Almorad A Europace. 2024; 26(5).

PMID: 38682165 PMC: 11089576. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae116.


Adding Electroanatomical Mapping to Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation Improves 1-Year Clinical Outcome and Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Tijskens M, Abugattas J, Thoen H, Strazdas A, Schwagten B, Wolf M J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024; 11(2).

PMID: 38392271 PMC: 10889252. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd11020057.

References
1.
Heeger C, Wissner E, Knoll M, Knoop B, Reissmann B, Mathew S . Three-Year Clinical Outcome After 2nd-Generation Cryoballoon-Based Pulmonary Vein Isolation for the Treatment of Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation - A 2-Center Experience. Circ J. 2017; 81(7):974-980. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1334. View

2.
Furnkranz A, Bordignon S, Schmidt B, Gunawardene M, Schulte-Hahn B, Urban V . Improved procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel second-generation cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24(5):492-7. DOI: 10.1111/jce.12082. View

3.
Boveda S, Providencia R, Albenque J, Combes N, Combes S, Hireche H . Real-time assessment of pulmonary vein disconnection during cryoablation of atrial fibrillation: can it be 'achieved' in almost all cases?. Europace. 2013; 16(6):826-33. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut366. View

4.
Yokoyama K, Tokuda M, Matsuo S, Isogai R, Tokutake K, Kato M . Pulmonary vein re-mapping after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2017; 20(6):943-948. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux129. View

5.
Conte G, Soejima K, de Asmundis C, Chierchia G, Badini M, Miwa Y . Value of high-resolution mapping in optimizing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 270:136-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.05.135. View