» Articles » PMID: 37066657

Identifying the Social Context of Single- and Mixed-species Group Formation in Large African Herbivores

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Apr 17
PMID 37066657
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite continued interest in mixed-species groups, we still lack a unified understanding of how ecological and social processes work across scales to influence group formation. Recent work has revealed ecological correlates of mixed-species group formation, but the mechanisms by which concomitant social dynamics produce these patterns, if at all, is unknown. Here, we use camera trap data for six mammalian grazer species in Serengeti National Park. Building on previous work, we found that ecological variables, and especially forage quality, influenced the chances of species overlap over small spatio-temporal scales (i.e. on the scales of several metres and hours). Migratory species (gazelle, wildebeest and zebra) were more likely to have heterospecific partners available in sites with higher forage quality, but the opposite was true for resident species (buffalo, hartebeest and topi). These findings illuminate the circumstances under which mixed-species group formation is even possible. Next, we found that greater heterospecific availability was associated with an increased probability of mixed-species group formation in gazelle, hartebeest, wildebeest and zebra, but ecological variables did not further shape these patterns. Overall, our results are consistent with a model whereby ecological and social drivers of group formation are species-specific and operate on different spatio-temporal scales. This article is part of the theme issue 'Mixed-species groups and aggregations: shaping ecological and behavioural patterns and processes'.

Citing Articles

Mixed-species groups and aggregations: shaping ecological and behavioural patterns and processes.

Carlson N, Freeberg T, Goodale E, Theo A Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1878):20220093.

PMID: 37066660 PMC: 10107224. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0093.


Identifying the social context of single- and mixed-species group formation in large African herbivores.

Saltz J, Palmer M, Beaudrot L Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 378(1878):20220105.

PMID: 37066657 PMC: 10107273. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0105.

References
1.
Girardeau A, Foley B, Saltz J . Comparing single- and mixed-species groups in fruit flies: differences in group dynamics, but not group formation. J Hered. 2021; 113(1):16-25. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esab041. View

2.
Webster M, Ward A . Personality and social context. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010; 86(4):759-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00169.x. View

3.
Daniel M, Koffinas L, Hughes K . Habituation underpins preference for mates with novel phenotypes in the guppy. Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1902):20190435. PMC: 6532517. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0435. View

4.
Terborgh J . Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: Costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys. Am J Primatol. 2020; 21(2):87-100. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.1350210203. View

5.
Saltz J . Genetic composition of social groups influences male aggressive behaviour and fitness in natural genotypes of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 2013; 280(1771):20131926. PMC: 3790486. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1926. View