» Articles » PMID: 37065664

The First 3D-bioprinted Personalized Active Bone to Repair Bone Defects: A Case Report

Overview
Journal Int J Bioprint
Date 2023 Apr 17
PMID 37065664
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The repair and reconstruction of bone defects are still major problems to be solved in the field of orthopedics. Meanwhile, 3D-bioprinted active bone implants may provide a new and effective solution. In this case, we used bioink prepared from the patient's autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with polycaprolactone/β-tricalcium phosphate (PCL/β-TCP) composite scaffold material to print personalized PCL/β-TCP/PRP active scaffolds layer by layer through 3D bioprinting technology. The scaffold was then applied in the patient to repair and reconstruct bone defect after tibial tumor resection. Compared with traditional bone implant materials, 3D-bioprinted personalized active bone will have significant clinical application prospects due to its advantages of biological activity, osteoinductivity, and personalized design.

Citing Articles

Innovative 3D printing technologies and advanced materials revolutionizing orthopedic surgery: current applications and future directions.

Cong B, Zhang H Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1542179.

PMID: 40008034 PMC: 11850356. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1542179.


Construction of a 3D Degradable PLLA/β-TCP/CS Scaffold for Establishing an Induced Membrane Inspired by the Modified Single-Stage Masquelet Technique.

Cen C, Zhang Y, Cao Y, Hu C, Tang L, Liu C ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025; 11(3):1629-1645.

PMID: 39943835 PMC: 11900768. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01849.


Advances in 3D printing technology for preparing bone tissue engineering scaffolds from biodegradable materials.

Wang Z, Sun Y, Li C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1483547.

PMID: 39610936 PMC: 11602280. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1483547.


Beyond hype: unveiling the Real challenges in clinical translation of 3D printed bone scaffolds and the fresh prospects of bioprinted organoids.

Zhao X, Li N, Zhang Z, Hong J, Zhang X, Hao Y J Nanobiotechnology. 2024; 22(1):500.

PMID: 39169401 PMC: 11337604. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-024-02759-z.


Calcium Phosphate Biomaterials for 3D Bioprinting in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Tolmacheva N, Bhattacharyya A, Noh I Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(2).

PMID: 38392140 PMC: 10886915. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9020095.


References
1.
Wei L, Wu S, Kuss M, Jiang X, Sun R, Reid P . 3D printing of silk fibroin-based hybrid scaffold treated with platelet rich plasma for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2019; 4:256-260. PMC: 6812411. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.09.001. View

2.
Santos M, Reis R . Vascularization in bone tissue engineering: physiology, current strategies, major hurdles and future challenges. Macromol Biosci. 2009; 10(1):12-27. DOI: 10.1002/mabi.200900107. View

3.
Walsh W, Vizesi F, Michael D, Auld J, Langdown A, Oliver R . Beta-TCP bone graft substitutes in a bilateral rabbit tibial defect model. Biomaterials. 2007; 29(3):266-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.035. View

4.
Byambaa B, Annabi N, Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez M, Jia W . Bioprinted Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Patterns for Engineering 3D Bone Tissue. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017; 6(16). PMC: 11034848. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201700015. View

5.
Agarwal R, Garcia A . Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015; 94:53-62. PMC: 4598264. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.03.013. View