Lumbar Lordosis Distribution in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal HSS J

Date 2023 Apr 17

PMID 37065105

Authors

Tenghui Ge

Linzhen Xie

Jianing Li

Jintao Ao

Jingye Wu

Yuqing Sun

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Restoring lumbar lordosis is important for adult spinal deformity surgery. Several reports have suggested that lumbar lordosis distribution has a significant impact on the outcome of surgery, including lumbar distribution index (LDI), proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL), and distal lumbar lordosis (DLL). The features of lumbar lordosis distribution are inconclusive in asymptomatic adults.

Questions/purposes: We sought to evaluate the variation of lumbar lordosis distribution (LDI, PLL, and DLL) and to identify associated factors in asymptomatic adult volunteers.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of the Embase and Medline databases to identify studies in asymptomatic adult volunteers to evaluate lumbar lordosis distribution including LDI, PLL, and DLL.

Results: Twelve articles met eligibility criteria and were included in our review. The respective pooled estimates of mean and variance, respectively, were 65.10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62.61-67.58) and 13.70% in LDI, 16.51° (95% CI: 5.54-27.49) and 11.46° in PLL, and 35.47° (95% CI: 32.79-38.18) and 9.10° in DLL. Lumbar lordosis distribution was associated with race, age, sex, body mass index, pelvic incidence, and Roussouly classification.

Conclusions: This systematic review found that despite a wide variation in LDI and PLL, DLL is maintained in a narrower range in asymptomatic adult volunteers, especially in white populations. Distal lumbar lordosis may be a more reliable radiographic parameter to restore the lumbar lordosis distribution in preoperative planning.

References

Arima H, Dimar 2nd J, Glassman S, Yamato Y, Matsuyama Y, Mac-Thiong J . Differences in lumbar and pelvic parameters among African American, Caucasian and Asian populations. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27(12):2990-2998. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5743-5. View

Anwar H, Butler J, Yarashi T, Rajakulendran K, Molloy S . Segmental Pelvic Correlation (SPeC): a novel approach to understanding sagittal plane spinal alignment. Spine J. 2015; 15(12):2518-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.09.021. View

McCarthy M, Lafage R, Smith J, Bess S, Ames C, Klineberg E . How Much Lumbar Lordosis does a Patient Need to Reach their Age-Adjusted Alignment Target? A Formulated Approach Predicting Successful Surgical Outcomes. Global Spine J. 2022; 14(1):41-48. PMC: 10676150. DOI: 10.1177/21925682221092003. View

Pesenti S, Prost S, McCausland A, Farah K, Tropiano P, Fuentes S . Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis. Adv Orthop. 2021; 2021:5572181. PMC: 8121594. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5572181. View

Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F . Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) Score: Development and Validation of a New Method of Analyzing Spinopelvic Alignment to Predict Mechanical Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(19):1661-1672. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01594. View

Scemama C, Laouissat F, Abelin-Genevois K, Roussouly P . Surgical treatment of thoraco-lumbar kyphosis (TLK) associated with low pelvic incidence. Eur Spine J. 2017; 26(8):2146-2152. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-4984-z. View

Schwab F, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Smith J . Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(13):E803-12. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318292b7b9. View

Chung N, Lee H, Jeon C . Differences in lumbar segment angle among Roussouly types of global sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adult subjects. Spine Deform. 2020; 8(2):227-232. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-019-00010-6. View

Sebaaly A, Grobost P, Mallam L, Roussouly P . Description of the sagittal alignment of the degenerative human spine. Eur Spine J. 2017; 27(2):489-496. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5404-0. View

10.

Xu F, Sun Z, Li W, Hou X, Jiang S, Zhou S . Correlation between lordosis distribution index, lordosis tilt, and occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2022; 31(2):267-274. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07090-x. View

11.

Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J . Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(3):346-53. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65. View

12.

Jacobs E, van Royen B, van Kuijk S, Merk J, Stadhouder A, van Rhijn L . Prediction of mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity surgery-the GAP score versus the Schwab classification. Spine J. 2018; 19(5):781-788. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.11.013. View

13.

Diebo B, Gammal I, Ha Y, Yoon S, Chang J, Kim B . Role of Ethnicity in Alignment Compensation: Propensity Matched Analysis of Differential Compensatory Mechanism Recruitment Patterns for Sagittal Malalignment in 288 ASD Patients From Japan, Korea, and United States. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017; 42(4):E234-E240. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001744. View

14.

Zhou Q, Sun X, Chen X, Xu L, Qian B, Zhu Z . How does sagittal spinopelvic alignment of lumbar multisegmental spondylolysis differ from monosegmental spondylolysis?. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020; 33(2):211-218. DOI: 10.3171/2020.2.SPINE191415. View

15.

Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M, Silvestre C, Kharrat K, Johanning Bari T, Kreichati G . Mechanical complications in adult spinal deformity and the effect of restoring the spinal shapes according to the Roussouly classification: a multicentric study. Eur Spine J. 2019; 29(4):904-913. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06253-1. View

16.

Riouallon G, Bouyer B, Wolff S . Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(8):2527-34. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4505-5. View

17.

Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Yavuz Y, Abul K, Boissiere L, Haddad S . Relative lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index: individualized pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters that quantify lumbar lordosis more precisely than the concept of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 43(6):E5. DOI: 10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17498. View

18.

Ma H, Hu Z, Shi B, Liu Z, Zhu Z, Chu W . Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score in asymptomatic individuals: is it universal?. Spine J. 2022; 22(9):1566-1575. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.003. View

19.

Lee C, Chung S, Park S, Kim D, Shin S . Simple prediction method of lumbar lordosis for planning of lumbar corrective surgery: radiological analysis in a Korean population. Eur Spine J. 2013; 23(1):192-7. PMC: 3897830. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2895-1. View

20.

Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry J, Gum J, Smith J . Defining Spino-Pelvic Alignment Thresholds: Should Operative Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Account for Age?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 41(1):62-8. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001171. View