Description of the Sagittal Alignment of the Degenerative Human Spine

Overview

Journal Eur Spine J

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2017 Nov 28

PMID 29177554

Citations 46

Authors

Amer Sebaaly

Pierre Grobost

Lisa Mallam

Pierre Roussouly

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To present the description of sagittal alignment of the degenerative human spine and its possible evolution.

Materials And Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of degenerative evolution in spinal alignment in low back pain patients. Full spine EOS sagittal X-rays were analyzed, and pelvic and spinal parameters were measured. Spinal shapes were classified on the hypothesis that the possible sagittal shapes of degenerative spine would be divided into four categories: "classical" Roussouly types 1-4, anteverted types (PT ≤ 5), retroverted types (PT ≥ 25) and kyphotic types.

Results: A total of 331 patients (280 women and 51 men) were included. "Classic" types 1-4 represented the majority in this cohort (71.9%). Retroverted types made the second most common category with 20.8% of the cohort. Kyphosis group (lumbar and global) make only 5.8% of this cohort, while anteverted group make the lowest incidence (1.5%). Retroverted type 2 with thoracic kyphosis should be considered a separate type and made 1.5% of this cohort. Two theoretical subtypes, retroverted type 1 and type 4 were not found.

Conclusions: This is the first description of degenerative spine disease based on its shape and based on the classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine described by Roussouly. Eleven types, divided into classical types, anteverted types, false shapes (retroverted) and kyphotic shapes, are described and an evolution pathway is proposed. An evaluation of surgical results in order to propose a treatment algorithm based on this classification should follow.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV cross sectional observational study.

Citing Articles

Risk factors for mechanical complications in degenerative lumbar scoliosis with concomitant thoracolumbar kyphosis: does the selection of the upper instrumented vertebra matter?.

Qiu W, Sun Z, Chen Z, Zhou S, Qi Q, Li W J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):81.

PMID: 39844199 PMC: 11756096. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05458-z.

Indications, complications and outcomes of minimally-invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion with anterior column realignment vs. standard LLIF using expandable interbody spacers.

Fischer G, Battig L, Schofl T, Schonfeld E, Veeravagu A, Martens B Front Surg. 2024; 11:1455445.

PMID: 39717354 PMC: 11663892. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1455445.

Examining autocorrection of concurrent cervical malalignment following thoracolumbar deformity surgery.

Yung A, Onafowokan O, Das A, Fisher M, Passias P J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024; 15(3):347-352.

PMID: 39483829 PMC: 11524556. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_109_24.

Letter to the Editor: Characteristics of Spinal Morphology According to the "Current" and "Theoretical" Roussouly Classification Systems in a Diverse, Asymptomatic Cohort: Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS).

Munoz Montoya J, Iyer P, Shetty A Global Spine J. 2024; 15(2):1467-1468.

PMID: 39275793 PMC: 11559740. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241280652.

Lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: techniques and outcomes.

Bourghli A, Boissiere L, Obeid I N Am Spine Soc J. 2024; 19:100516.

PMID: 39188669 PMC: 11345922. DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100516.

References

Debarge R, Demey G, Roussouly P . Sagittal balance analysis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5:619-25. PMC: 3175913. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1929-9. View

Bae J, Lee S, Shin S, Seo J, Kim K, Jang J . Radiological analysis of upper lumbar disc herniation and spinopelvic sagittal alignment. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(5):1382-1388. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4382-y. View

Maillot C, Ferrero E, Fort D, Heyberger C, Le Huec J . Reproducibility and repeatability of a new computerized software for sagittal spinopelvic and scoliosis curvature radiologic measurements: Keops(®). Eur Spine J. 2015; 24(7):1574-81. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3817-1. View

Mardare M, Oprea M, Popa I, Zazgyva A, Niculescu M, Poenaru D . Sagittal balance parameters correlate with spinal conformational type and MRI changes in lumbar degenerative disc disease: results of a retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016; 26(7):735-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-016-1842-3. View

Mac-Thiong J, Berthonnaud E, Dimar 2nd J, Betz R, Labelle H . Sagittal alignment of the spine and pelvis during growth. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(15):1642-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000132312.78469.7b. View

Obeid I, Boissiere L, Yilgor C, Larrieu D, Pellise F, Alanay A . Global tilt: a single parameter incorporating spinal and pelvic sagittal parameters and least affected by patient positioning. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25(11):3644-3649. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4649-3. View

Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D . Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(12):1077-82. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2. View

Laouissat F, Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M, Roussouly P . Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification. Eur Spine J. 2017; 27(8):2002-2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x. View

Mac-Thiong J, Labelle H, Roussouly P . Pediatric sagittal alignment. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5:586-90. PMC: 3175924. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1925-0. View

10.

Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J, Roussouly P, Labelle H . Analysis of the sagittal balance of the spine and pelvis using shape and orientation parameters. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18(1):40-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000117542.88865.77. View

11.

Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco J . Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5:578-85. PMC: 3175922. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1924-1. View

12.

Ryan D, Protopsaltis T, Ames C, Hostin R, Klineberg E, Mundis G . T1 pelvic angle (TPA) effectively evaluates sagittal deformity and assesses radiographical surgical outcomes longitudinally. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(15):1203-10. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000382. View

13.

Kepler C, Hilibrand A, Sayadipour A, Koerner J, Rihn J, Radcliff K . Clinical and radiographic degenerative spondylolisthesis (CARDS) classification. Spine J. 2014; 15(8):1804-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.045. View

14.

Gille O, Challier V, Parent H, Cavagna R, Poignard A, Faline A . Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: cohort of 670 patients, and proposal of a new classification. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100(6 Suppl):S311-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.006. View

15.

Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J . Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(3):346-53. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65. View

16.

Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco J . Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 5:609-18. PMC: 3175914. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x. View

17.

Duval-Beaupere G, Schmidt C, Cosson P . A Barycentremetric study of the sagittal shape of spine and pelvis: the conditions required for an economic standing position. Ann Biomed Eng. 1992; 20(4):451-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF02368136. View

18.

Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Deguise J . [A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2005; 189(2):287-97. View

19.

Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L, Templier A, Skalli W, Guigui P . Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(2):260-7. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02043. View

20.

Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C . Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998; 7(2):99-103. PMC: 3611230. DOI: 10.1007/s005860050038. View