» Articles » PMID: 37063452

Efficacy of Tunnel Technique (TUN) Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) in the Management of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects: A Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal Int J Dent
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Apr 17
PMID 37063452
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We systematically assessed the efficacy of tunnel technique (TUN) vs. coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the management of multiple gingival recession defects in adults.

Methods: Five databases were searched until September 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing TUN vs. CAF; grafts of interest were acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and connective tissue graft (CTG). Primary outcomes were root coverage (RC) and complete root coverage (CRC). Secondary outcomes were clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), and recession coverage (REC). Effect measures were risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with their confidence intervals (95% CI). Inverse variance methods and random-effects model meta-analyses were used. Subgroup analyses by the type of graft were performed. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE methodology.

Results: Five RCTs ( = 173) were included, with a follow-up of 6 months for all outcomes. In comparison to CAF, TUN did not significantly reduce CRC (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.002-176.7; = 0.51) and did not increase RC (MD 0.99%; 95% CI -6.7 to 8.6; = 0.80). In comparison to CAF, TUN showed no significant reduction of secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses by type of graft showed no differences in comparison to primary analyses for primary and secondary outcomes. Three RCTs had a high risk of bias, and five RCTs had very low quality of evidence for all outcomes.

Conclusions: In adults with gingival recessions, TUN had similar primary and secondary outcomes in comparison with CAF. Subgroup analyses by the type of graft did not affect main conclusions. More RCTs with better design are needed to further characterize the effects of TUN vs. CAF in the treatment of multiple gingival recession defects.

Citing Articles

Tunnel Technique and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft, With or Without Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid, in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: Prognostic Parameters for Clinical Treatment Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trial.

Gorski B, Skierska I, Nijakowski K, Brodzikowska A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39597902 PMC: 11594865. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226758.


Root Coverage Techniques: Coronally Advancement Flap vs. Tunnel Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chauca-Bajana L, Perez-Jardon A, Franca Vieira E Silva F, Conde-Amboage M, Velasquez-Ron B, Padin-Iruegas E Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39590391 PMC: 11592634. DOI: 10.3390/dj12110341.


Exploratory study on a novel minimally invasive tunnel like flap approach for orthodontic movement of dental implants.

Adly M, Cuisinier F, Adly A, Estephan E, Adly A, Bousquet P Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(11):595.

PMID: 39400762 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05992-w.


Clinical efficacy of Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) for treatment of multiple gingival recession defects: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Sabri H, SamavatiJame F, Sarkarat F, Wang H, Zadeh H Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(12):7171-7187.

PMID: 38010424 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05383-7.

References
1.
Rimbert M, Barre R . New Surgical Approach for Mandibular Anterior Root Coverage by Modified Tunnel Technique With Simultaneous Frenuloplasty: Technical Description and 5-Year Recall Case Report. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2021; 11(3):155-160. DOI: 10.1002/cap.10163. View

2.
Aroca S, Barbieri A, Clementini M, Renouard F, de Sanctis M . Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: Prognostic factors for achieving a complete root coverage. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45(7):861-868. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12923. View

3.
Dandu S, Murthy K . Multiple Gingival Recession Defects Treated with Coronally Advanced Flap and Either the VISTA Technique Enhanced with GEM 21S or Periosteal Pedicle Graft: A 9-Month Clinical Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016; 36(2):231-7. DOI: 10.11607/prd.2533. View

4.
Mathur M, VanderWeele T . Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Meta-Analyses. J Am Stat Assoc. 2020; 115(529):163-172. PMC: 7518377. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1529598. View

5.
De Sanctis M, Zucchelli G . Coronally advanced flap: a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: three-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34(3):262-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01039.x. View