» Articles » PMID: 39597902

Tunnel Technique and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft, With or Without Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid, in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: Prognostic Parameters for Clinical Treatment Outcomes of Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Nov 27
PMID 39597902
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate factors that influence the 12-month outcomes after the treatment of multiple gingival recessions (GRs) with a modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG), with cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA, tests) or without (controls). : Twenty-four patients with 266 GRs were treated. A logistic regression model was set to identify the baseline parameters that could predict the 12-month outcomes. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID No. NCT05045586). : The evaluated clinical and esthetic parameters showed marked improvement in both groups without any statistically significant differences between the groups, with the exception of the soft tissue texture (STT). The STT was in favor of the HA group (0.96 versus 0.73, = 0.0091). The likelihood of an MRC > 85%, of achieving CRC, and of gaining an RES = 10 was the highest for the incisors (reference group) and the lowest for the molars (OR = 0.046, = 0.005). With each 1 mm increase in the baseline clinical attachment level, the odds of failure (MRC < 85%, not achieving CRC) increased, whereas each 1 mm increase in the baseline keratinized tissue width (KTW) improved the chances of an MRC > 85%, of achieving CRC, and of gaining an RES = 10. The application of HA increased the likelihood of a perfect RES more than twofold (OR = 2.683, = 0.001). : The application of HA improved the 12-month esthetic outcomes after the treatment of GRs with the MCAT technique. The baseline CAL, KTW, and tooth type predicted the 12-month MRC, CRC, and RES. An evaluation of the baseline characteristics of the surgical area might help clinicians develop individualized treatment plans.

References
1.
Asparuhova M, Kiryak D, Eliezer M, Mihov D, Sculean A . Activity of two hyaluronan preparations on primary human oral fibroblasts. J Periodontal Res. 2018; 54(1):33-45. PMC: 6586051. DOI: 10.1111/jre.12602. View

2.
Cortellini P, Bissada N . Mucogingival conditions in the natural dentition: Narrative review, case definitions, and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018; 89 Suppl 1:S204-S213. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.16-0671. View

3.
Lipsky M, Su S, Crespo C, Hung M . Men and Oral Health: A Review of Sex and Gender Differences. Am J Mens Health. 2021; 15(3):15579883211016361. PMC: 8127762. DOI: 10.1177/15579883211016361. View

4.
Giorgetti A, Matos R, Casarin R, Pimentel S, Cirano F, Ribeiro F . Preemptive and Postoperative Medication Protocols for Root Coverage Combined with Connective Tissue Graft. Braz Dent J. 2017; 29(1):23-29. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201801452. View

5.
Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, Ravida A, Stefanini M, Suarez-Lopez Del Amo F, Wang H . Influence of tooth location on coronally advanced flap procedures for root coverage. J Periodontol. 2018; 89(12):1428-1441. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0201. View