» Articles » PMID: 37049093

Bioceramics/Electrospun Polymeric Nanofibrous and Carbon Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Apr 13
PMID 37049093
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone tissue engineering integrates biomaterials, cells, and bioactive agents to propose sophisticated treatment options over conventional choices. Scaffolds have central roles in this scenario, and precisely designed and fabricated structures with the highest similarity to bone tissue have shown promising outcomes. On the other hand, using nanotechnology and nanomaterials as the enabling options confers fascinating properties to the scaffolds, such as precisely tailoring the physicochemical features and better interactions with cells and surrounding tissues. Among different nanomaterials, polymeric nanofibers and carbon nanofibers have attracted significant attention due to their similarity to bone extracellular matrix (ECM) and high surface-to-volume ratio. Moreover, bone ECM is a biocomposite of collagen fibers and hydroxyapatite crystals; accordingly, researchers have tried to mimic this biocomposite using the mineralization of various polymeric and carbon nanofibers and have shown that the mineralized nanofibers are promising structures to augment the bone healing process in the tissue engineering scenario. In this paper, we reviewed the bone structure, bone defects/fracture healing process, and various structures/cells/growth factors applicable to bone tissue engineering applications. Then, we highlighted the mineralized polymeric and carbon nanofibers and their fabrication methods.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of the Association of Fibrin Scaffolds, Nanohydroxyapatite, and Photobiomodulation with Simultaneous Low-Level Red and Infrared Lasers in Bone Repair.

Rossi J, Araujo E, Camargo M, Ferreira Junior R, Barraviera B, Miglino M Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(17).

PMID: 39274741 PMC: 11395849. DOI: 10.3390/ma17174351.


An Overview on the Big Players in Bone Tissue Engineering: Biomaterials, Scaffolds and Cells.

Ferraz M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(7).

PMID: 38612646 PMC: 11012232. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25073836.


Research advances of nanomaterials for the acceleration of fracture healing.

Zhang M, Xu F, Cao J, Dou Q, Wang J, Wang J Bioact Mater. 2023; 31:368-394.

PMID: 37663621 PMC: 10474571. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.08.016.


Special Issue: Bioceramics, Bioglasses, and Gels for Tissue Engineering.

Dasan A, Chandrasekar A Gels. 2023; 9(7).

PMID: 37504465 PMC: 10379387. DOI: 10.3390/gels9070586.

References
1.
Pivonka P, Dunstan C . Role of mathematical modeling in bone fracture healing. Bonekey Rep. 2013; 1:221. PMC: 3727792. DOI: 10.1038/bonekey.2012.221. View

2.
Xia D, Yang F, Zheng Y, Liu Y, Zhou Y . Research status of biodegradable metals designed for oral and maxillofacial applications: A review. Bioact Mater. 2021; 6(11):4186-4208. PMC: 8099919. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.011. View

3.
De Witte T, Fratila-Apachitei L, Zadpoor A, Peppas N . Bone tissue engineering via growth factor delivery: from scaffolds to complex matrices. Regen Biomater. 2018; 5(4):197-211. PMC: 6077800. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rby013. View

4.
Luickx N, Van den Vreken N, DOosterlinck W, Van der Schueren L, Declercq H, De Clerck K . Optimization of the activation and nucleation steps in the precipitation of a calcium phosphate primer layer on electrospun poly(ɛ-caprolactone). J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014; 103(2):511-24. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35191. View

5.
Marsell R, Einhorn T . The biology of fracture healing. Injury. 2011; 42(6):551-5. PMC: 3105171. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031. View