» Articles » PMID: 37048013

Cell Phone Radiation Exposure Limits and Engineering Solutions

Abstract

In the 1990s, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) restricted its risk assessment for human exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) in seven ways: (1) Inappropriate focus on heat, ignoring sub-thermal effects. (2) Reliance on exposure experiments performed over very short times. (3) Overlooking time/amplitude characteristics of RFR signals. (4) Ignoring carcinogenicity, hypersensitivity, and other health conditions connected with RFR. (5) Measuring cellphone Specific Absorption Rates (SAR) at arbitrary distances from the head. (6) Averaging SAR doses at volumetric/mass scales irrelevant to health. (7) Using unrealistic simulations for cell phone SAR estimations. Low-cost software and hardware modifications are proposed here for cellular phone RFR exposure mitigation: (1) inhibiting RFR emissions in contact with the body, (2) use of antenna patterns reducing the Percent of Power absorbed in the Head (PPHead) and body and increasing the Percent of Power Radiated for communications (PPR), and (3) automated protocol-based reductions of the number of RFR emissions, their duration, or integrated dose. These inexpensive measures do not fundamentally alter cell phone functions or communications quality. A health threat is scientifically documented at many levels and acknowledged by industries. Yet mitigation of RFR exposures to users does not appear as a priority with most cell phone manufacturers.

Citing Articles

Thyroid Screening Techniques via Bioelectromagnetic Sensing: Imaging Models and Analytical and Computational Methods.

Varvari A, Pitilakis A, Karatzidis D, Kantartzis N Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(18).

PMID: 39338849 PMC: 11435840. DOI: 10.3390/s24186104.


Deciphering the relationship between temperature and immunity.

Maloney E, Duffy D Discov Immunol. 2024; 3(1):kyae001.

PMID: 38567294 PMC: 10917241. DOI: 10.1093/discim/kyae001.

References
1.
Banik S, Bandyopadhyay S, Ganguly S . Bioeffects of microwave--a brief review. Bioresour Technol. 2003; 87(2):155-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(02)00169-4. View

2.
Mitchell P . Chemiosmotic coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1966; 41(3):445-502. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1966.tb01501.x. View

3.
Coureau G, Bouvier G, Lebailly P, Fabbro-Peray P, Gruber A, Leffondre K . Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study. Occup Environ Med. 2014; 71(7):514-22. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101754. View

4.
Beignon F, Gueguen N, Tricoire-Leignel H, Mattei C, Lenaers G . The multiple facets of mitochondrial regulations controlling cellular thermogenesis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022; 79(10):525. PMC: 11802959. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-022-04523-8. View

5.
Levitt B, Lai H, Manville A . Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields on flora and fauna, Part 3. Exposure standards, public policy, laws, and future directions. Rev Environ Health. 2021; 37(4):531-558. DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0083. View