» Articles » PMID: 37044175

Applying Behavioral Economics-based Approaches to Examine the Effects of Liquid Sucrose Consumption on Motivation

Overview
Journal Appetite
Date 2023 Apr 12
PMID 37044175
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Overconsumption of sugar contributes to obesity in part by changing the activity of brain areas that drive the motivation to seek out and consume food. Sugar-sweetened beverages are the most common source of excess dietary sugar and contribute to weight gain. However, very few studies have assessed the effects of liquid sucrose consumption on motivation. This is due in part to the need for novel approaches to assess motivation in pre-clinical models. To address this, we developed a within-session behavioral economics procedure to assess motivation for liquid sucrose. We first established and validated the procedure: we tested several sucrose concentrations, evaluated sensitivity of the procedure to satiety, and optimized several testing parameters. We then applied this new procedure to determine how intermittent vs. continuous access to liquid sucrose (1 M) in the home cage affects sucrose motivation. We found that intermittent liquid sucrose access results in an escalation of sucrose intake in the home cage, without altering motivation for liquid sucrose during demand testing (1 M or 0.25 M) compared to water-maintained controls. In contrast, continuous home cage access selectively blunted motivation for 1 M sucrose, while motivation for 0.25 M sucrose was similar to intermittent sucrose and control groups. Thus, effects of continuous home cage liquid sucrose access were selective to the familiar sucrose concentration. Finally, effects of sucrose on motivation recovered after removal of liquid sucrose from the diet. These data provide a new approach to examine motivation for liquid sucrose and show that escalation of intake and motivation for sucrose are dissociable processes.

References
1.
Rasmussen E, Reilly W, Hillman C . Demand for sucrose in the genetically obese Zucker (fa/fa) rat. Behav Processes. 2010; 85(2):191-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.008. View

2.
Malik V, Popkin B, Bray G, Despres J, Hu F . Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010; 121(11):1356-64. PMC: 2862465. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185. View

3.
Boswell R, Kober H . Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review. Obes Rev. 2015; 17(2):159-77. PMC: 6042864. DOI: 10.1111/obr.12354. View

4.
Reilly S . Reinforcement value of gustatory stimuli determined by progressive ratio performance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1999; 63(2):301-11. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00009-x. View

5.
Tsunematsu S . Effort- and time-cost effects on demand curves for food by pigeons under short session closed economies. Behav Processes. 2001; 53(1-2):47-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00147-9. View