» Articles » PMID: 37038616

Effectiveness, Safety, Initial Optimal Dose, and Optimal Maintenance Dose Range of Basal Insulin Regimens for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the effectiveness, safety, optimal starting dose, optimal maintenance dose range, and target fasting plasma glucose of five basal insulins in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to February 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was adopted. The registration ID is CRD42022319078 in PROSPERO.

Results: Among 11 163 citations retrieved, 35 publications met the planned criteria. From meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, we found that when injecting basal insulin regimens at bedtime, the optimal choice in order of most to least effective might be glargine U-300 or degludec U-100, glargine U-100 or detemir, followed by neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH). Injecting glargine U-100 in the morning may be more effective (ie, more patients archiving glycated hemoglobin < 7.0%) and lead to fewer hypoglycemic events than injecting it at bedtime. The optimal starting dose for the initiation of any basal insulins can be 0.10-0.20 U/kg/day. There is no eligible evidence to investigate the optimal maintenance dose for basal insulins.

Conclusions: The five basal insulins are effective for the target population. Glargine U-300, degludec U-100, glargine U-100, and detemir lead to fewer hypoglycemic events than NPH without compromising glycemic control.

Citing Articles

Use of basal insulin in the management of adults with type 2 diabetes: An Asia-Pacific evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Ji L, Luo Y, Bee Y, Xia J, Thy Nguyen K, Zhao W J Diabetes. 2023; 15(6):474-487.

PMID: 37088916 PMC: 10270740. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13392.


Effectiveness, safety, initial optimal dose, and optimal maintenance dose range of basal insulin regimens for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Luo Y, Xia J, Zhao Z, Chang Y, Bee Y, Thy Nguyen K J Diabetes. 2023; 15(5):419-435.

PMID: 37038616 PMC: 10172019. DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13381.

References
1.
Ji L, Kang E, Dong X, Li L, Yuan G, Shang S . Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL in Asia Pacific insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes: The EDITION AP randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019; 22(4):612-621. PMC: 7384042. DOI: 10.1111/dom.13936. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Yuan L, Li F, Zhou Y, Sun R, Gao G, Zhang Q . Fasting Glucose of 6.1 mmol/L as a Possible Optimal Target for Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Diabetes Res. 2021; 2021:5524313. PMC: 8294995. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5524313. View

4.
Mannucci E, Caiulo C, Naletto L, Madama G, Monami M . Efficacy and safety of different basal and prandial insulin analogues for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endocrine. 2021; 74(3):508-517. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-021-02889-6. View

5.
Yang W, Ma J, Yuan G, Li L, Zhang M, Lu Y . Determining the optimal fasting glucose target for patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of the multicentre, open-label, randomized-controlled FPG GOAL trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019; 21(8):1973-1977. PMC: 6772047. DOI: 10.1111/dom.13733. View