» Articles » PMID: 37035752

Affects Pigmentation Divergence and Cuticular Hydrocarbons in and

Overview
Journal Front Ecol Evol
Date 2023 Apr 10
PMID 37035752
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

pigmentation has been a fruitful model system for understanding the genetic and developmental mechanisms underlying phenotypic evolution. For example, prior work has shown that divergence of the gene contributes to pigmentation differences between two members of the virilis group: , which has a light yellow body color, and , which has a dark brown body color. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping and expression analysis has suggested that divergence of the gene might also contribute to pigmentation differences between these two species. Here, we directly test this hypothesis by using CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to generate null mutants in and and then using reciprocal hemizygosity testing to compare the effects of each species' allele on pigmentation. We find that divergence of does indeed contribute to the pigmentation divergence between species, with effects on both the overall body color as well as a difference in pigmentation along the dorsal abdominal midline. Motivated by recent work in , we also used the null mutants to test for effects of on cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profiles. We found that affects CHC abundance in both species, but does not contribute to qualitative differences in the CHC profiles between these two species. Additional transgenic resources for working with and such as mutants of both species and mutants in , were generated in the course of this work and are also described. Taken together, this study advances our understanding of loci contributing to phenotypic divergence and illustrates how the latest genome editing tools can be used for functional testing in non-model species.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of ebony as a potential selectable marker for genetic sexing in Aedes aegypti.

Nikolouli K, Compton A, Tu Z, Bourtzis K Parasit Vectors. 2025; 18(1):76.

PMID: 40001184 PMC: 11863432. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-025-06709-y.


Functional genomics implicates ebony in the black pupae phenotype of tephritid fruit flies.

Paulo D, Nguyen T, Ward C, Corpuz R, Kauwe A, Rendon P Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):60.

PMID: 39814836 PMC: 11736145. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07489-y.


Divergence and introgression among the group of .

Yusuf L, Tyukmaeva V, Hoikkala A, Ritchie M Evol Lett. 2022; 6(6):537-551.

PMID: 36579165 PMC: 9783487. DOI: 10.1002/evl3.301.


Desiccation resistance differences in species can be largely explained by variations in cuticular hydrocarbons.

Wang Z, Receveur J, Pu J, Cong H, Richards C, Liang M Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36473178 PMC: 9757832. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.80859.


The role of the epidermis enhancer element in positive and negative transcriptional regulation of ebony in Drosophila melanogaster.

Akiyama N, Sato S, Tanaka K, Sakai T, Takahashi A G3 (Bethesda). 2022; 12(3).

PMID: 35100378 PMC: 8895987. DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac010.


References
1.
Stern D . Identification of loci that cause phenotypic variation in diverse species with the reciprocal hemizygosity test. Trends Genet. 2014; 30(12):547-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.09.006. View

2.
Liu M, Rehman S, Tang X, Gu K, Fan Q, Chen D . Methodologies for Improving HDR Efficiency. Front Genet. 2019; 9:691. PMC: 6338032. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00691. View

3.
Bassett A, Tibbit C, Ponting C, Liu J . Highly efficient targeted mutagenesis of Drosophila with the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Rep. 2013; 4(1):220-8. PMC: 3714591. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.020. View

4.
Ahmed-Braimah Y, McAllister B . Rapid Evolution of Assortative Fertilization between Recently Allopatric Species of Drosophila. Int J Evol Biol. 2012; 2012:285468. PMC: 3270401. DOI: 10.1155/2012/285468. View

5.
Massey J, Wittkopp P . The Genetic Basis of Pigmentation Differences Within and Between Drosophila Species. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016; 119:27-61. PMC: 5002358. DOI: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.03.004. View