» Articles » PMID: 37034424

Spatio-Temporal Variations in Carbon Isotope Discrimination Predicted by the JULES Land Surface Model

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 10
PMID 37034424
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Stable carbon isotopes in plants can help evaluate and improve the representation of carbon and water cycles in land-surface models, increasing confidence in projections of vegetation response to climate change. Here, we evaluated the predictive skills of the Joint UK Land Environmental Simulator (JULES) to capture spatio-temporal variations in carbon isotope discrimination (ΔC) reconstructed by tree rings at 12 sites in the United Kingdom over the period 1979-2016. Modeled and measured ΔC time series were compared at each site and their relationships with local climate investigated. Modeled ΔC time series were significantly correlated ( < 0.05) with tree-ring ΔC at eight sites, but JULES underestimated mean ΔC values at all sites, by up to 2.6‰. Differences in mean ΔC may result from post-photosynthetic isotopic fractionations that were not considered in JULES. Inter-annual variability in ΔC was also underestimated by JULES at all sites. While modeled ΔC typically increased over time across the UK, tree-ring ΔC values increased only at five sites located in the northern regions but decreased at the southern-most sites. Considering all sites together, JULES captured the overall influence of environmental drivers on ΔC but failed to capture the direction of change in ΔC caused by air temperature, atmospheric CO and vapor pressure deficit at some sites. Results indicate that the representation of carbon-water coupling in JULES could be improved to reproduce both the trend and magnitude of interannual variability in isotopic records, the influence of local climate on ΔC, and to reduce uncertainties in predicting vegetation-environment interactions.

Citing Articles

Spatio-Temporal Variations in Carbon Isotope Discrimination Predicted by the JULES Land Surface Model.

Palmer L, Robertson I, Lavergne A, Hemming D, Loader N, Young G J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2023; 127(12):e2022JG007041.

PMID: 37034424 PMC: 10078459. DOI: 10.1029/2022JG007041.

References
1.
Bodin P, Gagen M, McCarroll D, Loader N, Jalkanen R, Robertson I . Comparing the performance of different stomatal conductance models using modelled and measured plant carbon isotope ratios (δ(13) C): implications for assessing physiological forcing. Glob Chang Biol. 2013; 19(6):1709-19. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12192. View

2.
Voelker S, Meinzer F, Lachenbruch B, Brooks J, Guyette R . Drivers of radial growth and carbon isotope discrimination of bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa Michx.) across continental gradients in precipitation, vapour pressure deficit and irradiance. Plant Cell Environ. 2013; 37(3):766-79. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12196. View

3.
Tcherkez G, Farquhar G, Badeck F, Ghashghaie J . Theoretical considerations about carbon isotope distribution in glucose of C plants. Funct Plant Biol. 2020; 31(9):857-877. DOI: 10.1071/FP04053. View

4.
Wong S, Cowan I, Farquhar G . Leaf Conductance in Relation to Assimilation in Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng: Influence of Irradiance and Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide. Plant Physiol. 1978; 62(4):670-4. PMC: 1092192. DOI: 10.1104/pp.62.4.670. View

5.
Lloyd J, Farquhar G . C discrimination during CO assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere. Oecologia. 2017; 99(3-4):201-215. DOI: 10.1007/BF00627732. View