» Articles » PMID: 37032729

Comprehensive Review on Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Tissue Acquisition Techniques for Solid Pancreatic Tumor

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is speculated to become the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality by 2030, a high mortality rate considering the number of cases. Surgery and chemotherapy are the main treatment options, but they are burdensome for patients. A clear histological diagnosis is needed to determine a treatment plan, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (TA) is a suitable technique that does not worsen the cancer-specific prognosis even for lesions at risk of needle tract seeding. With the development of personalized medicine and precision treatment, there has been an increasing demand to increase cell counts and collect specimens while preserving tissue structure, leading to the development of the fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle. EUS-FNB is rapidly replacing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) as the procedure of choice for EUS-TA of pancreatic cancer. However, EUS-FNA is sometimes necessary where the FNB needle cannot penetrate small hard lesions, so it is important clinicians are familiar with both. Given these recent dev-elopments, we present an up-to-date review of the role of EUS-TA in pancreatic cancer. Particularly, technical aspects, such as needle caliber, negative pressure, and puncture methods, for obtaining an adequate specimen in EUS-TA are discussed.

Citing Articles

Comparing needle types and aspiration techniques in EUS-TA to optimize diagnostic efficacy and specimen quality in patients with pancreatic lesions.

Shang R, Han X, He F, Huang L, Zeng C, Chen K Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1422600.

PMID: 39712178 PMC: 11658985. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1422600.


Percutaneous Biopsy and Drainage of the Pancreas.

Redstone E, Li Z Semin Intervent Radiol. 2024; 41(5):473-485.

PMID: 39664220 PMC: 11631371. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1792138.


The diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal subepithelial lesions: A review.

Li W, Shao M, Hu S, Xie S, He B Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(46):e40419.

PMID: 39560558 PMC: 11576025. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040419.


The factors that influence the diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions.

Sun L, Li Y, Song Q, Peng L, Xing Y, Huang H Endosc Ultrasound. 2024; 13(3):183-189.

PMID: 39318648 PMC: 11419504. DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000060.


Oil blotting paper for formalin fixation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition-collected sample volumes on glass slides.

Yamai T, Ikezawa K, Seiki Y, Watsuji K, Kawamoto Y, Hirao T Cancer Med. 2024; 13(9):e7189.

PMID: 38706442 PMC: 11070842. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7189.


References
1.
Lowery M, Jordan E, Basturk O, Ptashkin R, Zehir A, Berger M . Real-Time Genomic Profiling of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Potential Actionability and Correlation with Clinical Phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23(20):6094-6100. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0899. View

2.
Tarantino I, Di Mitri R, Fabbri C, Pagano N, Barresi L, Granata A . Is diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration on solid pancreatic lesions aspiration-related? A multicentre randomised trial. Dig Liver Dis. 2014; 46(6):523-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.02.023. View

3.
Kyu Lee J, Choi J, Lee K, Kim K, Shin J, Lee J . A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 77(5):745-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.009. View

4.
Allegretti M, Fabi A, Buglioni S, Martayan A, Conti L, Pescarmona E . Tearing down the walls: FDA approves next generation sequencing (NGS) assays for actionable cancer genomic aberrations. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018; 37(1):47. PMC: 5838869. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0702-x. View

5.
Wani S, Mullady D, Early D, Rastogi A, Collins B, Wang J . The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110(10):1429-39. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.262. View