» Articles » PMID: 34056041

The Impact of Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2021 May 31
PMID 34056041
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the last few decades, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition has become the method of choice for the pathological diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. Due to its high diagnostic yield and low complication rate, EUS-guided tissue acquisition has surpassed percutaneous sampling techniques. For many years, EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was traditionally used to obtain cytological aspirates of solid pancreatic lesions, with sensitivity values ranging from 80 to 90% for the diagnosis of malignancy. Nevertheless, despite numerous technical advances, EUS-FNA still presents some limitations. Therefore, EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) has been introduced to provide tissue core biopsies, allowing histological assessment. A newly developed generation of FNB needles has demonstrated an outstanding diagnostic accuracy of over 95% for solid pancreatic lesions and provides samples appropriate for ancillary testing, such as immunohistochemistry and tumour molecular profiling. As a result, EUS-FNB is rapidly replacing EUS-FNA and is now the recommended technique for EUS-guided tissue acquisition in pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, with the recent expansion of neoadjuvant treatment criteria and with the advent of novel and personalised anti-cancer therapies, EUS-FNB is gaining a pivotal role in pancreatic cancer management and might soon be generalised to all patients, independent of disease stage. In this article, the authors present an updated review of the role of EUS-guided tissue acquisition in pancreatic cancer. Current indications, several technical aspects and new applications of EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB are discussed.

Citing Articles

The factors that influence the diagnostic accuracy and sample adequacy of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions.

Sun L, Li Y, Song Q, Peng L, Xing Y, Huang H Endosc Ultrasound. 2024; 13(3):183-189.

PMID: 39318648 PMC: 11419504. DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000060.


The Initial Journey of Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer (PaCTO Project): A Nationwide Survey among Portuguese Specialist Physicians.

Barros A, Mansinho H, Couto N, Teixeira M, Tonin F, Francisco R GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2024; 31(4):262-272.

PMID: 39114325 PMC: 11305690. DOI: 10.1159/000533178.


Updated techniques and evidence for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions.

Itonaga M, Ashida R, Kitano M DEN Open. 2024; 5(1):e399.

PMID: 38911353 PMC: 11190023. DOI: 10.1002/deo2.399.


A Rapid On-Line Evaluation (ROLE) Protocol in the Diagnostic Performance Improvement in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.

Cai Y, Rao X, Zhang J, Liu G, Zheng Y, Yue T Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535018 PMC: 10969145. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060597.


Clinical value of endoscopic ultrasound sound speed in differential diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesion and prognosis of pancreatic cancer.

Qiu J, Li K, Long X, Yu X, Gong P, Long Y Cancer Med. 2024; 13(5):e7026.

PMID: 38477492 PMC: 10935872. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7026.


References
1.
Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Buccino V, Purohit P, Setia P, Muscatiello N . Diagnostic yield of Franseen and Fork-Tip biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: a meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2019; 7(10):E1221-E1230. PMC: 6773615. DOI: 10.1055/a-0982-2997. View

2.
Lee L, Nieto J, Watson R, Hwang A, Muthusamy V, Walter L . Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing Diagnostic Yield of Cytopathologist-guided versus 7 passes for EUS-FNA of Pancreatic Masses. Dig Endosc. 2015; 28(4):469-475. DOI: 10.1111/den.12594. View

3.
Song T, Kim J, Lee S, Eum J, Moon S, Park D . The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105(8):1739-45. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.108. View

4.
Elhanafi S, Mahmud N, Vergara N, Kochman M, Das K, Ginsberg G . Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound tissue acquisition methods for genomic analysis of pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 34(5):907-913. PMC: 6497552. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14540. View

5.
Bang J, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S . EUS-guided fine needle biopsy of pancreatic masses can yield true histology. Gut. 2017; 67(12):2081-2084. PMC: 6241607. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315154. View