» Articles » PMID: 37030684

One Model to Synthesize Them All: Multi-Contrast Multi-Scale Transformer for Missing Data Imputation

Overview
Date 2023 Apr 8
PMID 37030684
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Multi-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in clinical practice as each contrast provides complementary information. However, the availability of each imaging contrast may vary amongst patients, which poses challenges to radiologists and automated image analysis algorithms. A general approach for tackling this problem is missing data imputation, which aims to synthesize the missing contrasts from existing ones. While several convolutional neural networks (CNN) based algorithms have been proposed, they suffer from the fundamental limitations of CNN models, such as the requirement for fixed numbers of input and output channels, the inability to capture long-range dependencies, and the lack of interpretability. In this work, we formulate missing data imputation as a sequence-to-sequence learning problem and propose a multi-contrast multi-scale Transformer (MMT), which can take any subset of input contrasts and synthesize those that are missing. MMT consists of a multi-scale Transformer encoder that builds hierarchical representations of inputs combined with a multi-scale Transformer decoder that generates the outputs in a coarse-to-fine fashion. The proposed multi-contrast Swin Transformer blocks can efficiently capture intra- and inter-contrast dependencies for accurate image synthesis. Moreover, MMT is inherently interpretable as it allows us to understand the importance of each input contrast in different regions by analyzing the in-built attention maps of Transformer blocks in the decoder. Extensive experiments on two large-scale multi-contrast MRI datasets demonstrate that MMT outperforms the state-of-the-art methods quantitatively and qualitatively.

Citing Articles

Similarity and quality metrics for MR image-to-image translation.

Dohmen M, Klemens M, Baltruschat I, Truong T, Lenga M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3853.

PMID: 39890963 PMC: 11785996. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87358-0.


Advancing clinical MRI exams with artificial intelligence: Japan's contributions and future prospects.

Fujita S, Fushimi Y, Ito R, Matsui Y, Tatsugami F, Fujioka T Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 43(3):355-364.

PMID: 39548049 PMC: 11868336. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01689-y.


CT synthesis with deep learning for MR-only radiotherapy planning: a review.

Roh J, Ryu D, Lee J Biomed Eng Lett. 2024; 14(6):1259-1278.

PMID: 39465111 PMC: 11502731. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00430-y.


Deep learning for accelerated and robust MRI reconstruction.

Heckel R, Jacob M, Chaudhari A, Perlman O, Shimron E MAGMA. 2024; 37(3):335-368.

PMID: 39042206 PMC: 11316714. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-024-01173-8.


Transformers and large language models in healthcare: A review.

Nerella S, Bandyopadhyay S, Zhang J, Contreras M, Siegel S, Bumin A Artif Intell Med. 2024; 154:102900.

PMID: 38878555 PMC: 11638972. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102900.


References
1.
Baessler B, Weiss K, Pinto Dos Santos D . Robustness and Reproducibility of Radiomics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Phantom Study. Invest Radiol. 2018; 54(4):221-228. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000530. View

2.
Zhou J, Damasceno P, Chachad R, Cheung J, Ballatori A, Lotz J . Automatic Vertebral Body Segmentation Based on Deep Learning of Dixon Images for Bone Marrow Fat Fraction Quantification. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020; 11:612. PMC: 7492292. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00612. View

3.
Dickinson L, Ahmed H, Allen C, Barentsz J, Carey B, Futterer J . Clinical applications of multiparametric MRI within the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Urol Oncol. 2013; 31(3):281-4. PMC: 4274606. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.02.004. View

4.
Jayachandran Preetha C, Meredig H, Brugnara G, Mahmutoglu M, Foltyn M, Isensee F . Deep-learning-based synthesis of post-contrast T1-weighted MRI for tumour response assessment in neuro-oncology: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study. Lancet Digit Health. 2021; 3(12):e784-e794. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00205-3. View

5.
Haubold J, Demircioglu A, Theysohn J, Wetter A, Radbruch A, Dorner N . Generating Virtual Short Tau Inversion Recovery (STIR) Images from T1- and T2-Weighted Images Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network in Spine Imaging. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(9). PMC: 8467788. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11091542. View