» Articles » PMID: 37009717

Fabrication of Extract Loaded Gradient Scaffold with an Integrated Architecture for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration: Morphology, Structure, and Bioactivity

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Regeneration of osteochondral tissue with its layered complex structure and limited self-repair capacity has come into prominence as an application area for biomaterial design. Thus, literature studies have aimed to design multilayered scaffolds using natural polymers to mimic its unique structure. In this study, fabricated scaffolds are composed of transition layers both chemically and morphologically to mimic the gradient structure of osteochondral tissue. The aim of this study is to produce gradient chitosan (CHI) scaffolds with bioactive snail () mucus (M) and slime (S) extract and investigate the structures regarding their physicochemical, mechanical, and morphological characteristics as well as cytocompatibility and bioactivity. Gradient scaffolds (CHI-M and CHI-S) were fabricated via a layer-by-layer freezing and lyophilization technique. Highly porous and continuous 3D structures were obtained and observed with SEM analysis. In addition, scaffolds were physically characterized with water uptake test, micro-CT, mechanical analysis (compression tests), and XRD analysis. bioactivity of scaffolds was investigated by co-culturing Saos-2 and SW1353 cells on each compartment of gradient scaffolds. Osteogenic activity of Saos-2 cells on extract loaded gradient scaffolds was investigated in terms of ALP secretion, osteocalcin (OC) production, and biomineralization. Chondrogenic bioactivity of SW1353 cells was investigated regarding COMP and GAG production and observed with Alcian Blue staining. Both mucus and slime incorporation in the chitosan matrix increased the osteogenic differentiation of Saos-2 and SW1353 cells in comparison to the pristine matrix. In addition, histological and immunohistological staining was performed to investigate ECM formation on gradient scaffolds. Both characterization and bioactivity results indicated that CHI-M and CHI-S scaffolds show potential for osteochondral tissue regeneration, mimicking the structure as well as enhancing physical characteristics and bioactivity.

Citing Articles

Integrated metabolome and transcriptome analysis reveals key genes and pathways associated with egg yolk percentage in chicken.

Li W, Luo Y, Zhu S, Wang M, Zhao X, Ning Z Poult Sci. 2025; 104(3):104815.

PMID: 39914020 PMC: 11848451. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.104815.


Fabrication of Bioactive Extract-Loaded Chitosan-Based Bilayer Wound Dressings for Skin Tissue Regeneration.

Perpelek M, Tamburaci S, Karakasli A, Tihminlioglu F ACS Omega. 2024; 9(49):48070-48088.

PMID: 39676965 PMC: 11635475. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04345.


Gastropod Mucus: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Biological Activities, Applications, and Strategic Priorities.

Liegertova M, Maly J ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023; 9(10):5567-5579.

PMID: 37751898 PMC: 10566510. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01096.

References
1.
Beris A, Lykissas M, Papageorgiou C, Georgoulis A . Advances in articular cartilage repair. Injury. 2005; 36 Suppl 4:S14-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.10.007. View

2.
Lopez Angulo D, Sobral P . Characterization of gelatin/chitosan scaffold blended with aloe vera and snail mucus for biomedical purpose. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016; 92:645-653. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.07.029. View

3.
Greistorfer S, Klepal W, Cyran N, Gugumuck A, Rudoll L, Suppan J . Snail mucus - glandular origin and composition in Helix pomatia. Zoology (Jena). 2017; 122:126-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2017.05.001. View

4.
McDermott M, Cerullo A, Parziale J, Achrak E, Sultana S, Ferd J . Advancing Discovery of Snail Mucins Function and Application. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 9:734023. PMC: 8542881. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.734023. View

5.
Goldring S, Goldring M . Changes in the osteochondral unit during osteoarthritis: structure, function and cartilage-bone crosstalk. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016; 12(11):632-644. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.148. View