» Articles » PMID: 37002222

Meta-learning Biologically Plausible Plasticity Rules with Random Feedback Pathways

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Mar 31
PMID 37002222
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Backpropagation is widely used to train artificial neural networks, but its relationship to synaptic plasticity in the brain is unknown. Some biological models of backpropagation rely on feedback projections that are symmetric with feedforward connections, but experiments do not corroborate the existence of such symmetric backward connectivity. Random feedback alignment offers an alternative model in which errors are propagated backward through fixed, random backward connections. This approach successfully trains shallow models, but learns slowly and does not perform well with deeper models or online learning. In this study, we develop a meta-learning approach to discover interpretable, biologically plausible plasticity rules that improve online learning performance with fixed random feedback connections. The resulting plasticity rules show improved online training of deep models in the low data regime. Our results highlight the potential of meta-learning to discover effective, interpretable learning rules satisfying biological constraints.

Citing Articles

Discovering plasticity rules that organize and maintain neural circuits.

Bell D, Duffy A, Fairhall A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39605419 PMC: 11601609. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.18.623688.


Neuroscientific insights about computer vision models: a concise review.

Susan S Biol Cybern. 2024; 118(5-6):331-348.

PMID: 39382577 DOI: 10.1007/s00422-024-00998-9.


Deep Learning without Weight Symmetry.

Ji-An L, Benna M ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38855537 PMC: 11160852.


Specific connectivity optimizes learning in thalamocortical loops.

Lakshminarasimhan K, Xie M, Cohen J, Sauerbrei B, Hantman A, Litwin-Kumar A Cell Rep. 2024; 43(4):114059.

PMID: 38602873 PMC: 11104520. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114059.


Meta-learning biologically plausible plasticity rules with random feedback pathways.

Shervani-Tabar N, Rosenbaum R Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):1805.

PMID: 37002222 PMC: 10066328. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37562-1.

References
1.
Froemke R, Tsay I, Raad M, Long J, Dan Y . Contribution of individual spikes in burst-induced long-term synaptic modification. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 95(3):1620-9. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00910.2005. View

2.
Graupner M, Brunel N . Calcium-based plasticity model explains sensitivity of synaptic changes to spike pattern, rate, and dendritic location. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(10):3991-6. PMC: 3309784. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109359109. View

3.
Graupner M, Wallisch P, Ostojic S . Natural Firing Patterns Imply Low Sensitivity of Synaptic Plasticity to Spike Timing Compared with Firing Rate. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(44):11238-11258. PMC: 5148241. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0104-16.2016. View

4.
Letzkus J, Kampa B, Stuart G . Learning rules for spike timing-dependent plasticity depend on dendritic synapse location. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(41):10420-9. PMC: 6674691. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2650-06.2006. View

5.
Karayiannis N . Accelerating the training of feedforward neural networks using generalized Hebbian rules for initializing the internal representations. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. 1996; 7(2):419-26. DOI: 10.1109/72.485677. View