» Articles » PMID: 37000320

Simulation-based Evaluation of SAR and Flip Angle Homogeneity for Five Transmit Head Arrays at 14 T

Overview
Journal MAGMA
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Mar 31
PMID 37000320
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Various research sites are pursuing 14 T MRI systems. However, both local SAR and RF transmit field inhomogeneity will increase. The aim of this simulation study is to investigate the trade-offs between peak local SAR and flip angle uniformity for five transmit coil array designs at 14 T in comparison to 7 T.

Methods: Investigated coil array designs are: 8 dipole antennas (8D), 16 dipole antennas (16D), 8 loop coils (8D), 16 loop coils (16L), 8 dipoles/8 loop coils (8D8L) and for reference 8 dipoles at 7 T. Both RF shimming and k-points were investigated by plotting L-curves of peak SAR levels vs flip angle homogeneity.

Results: For RF shimming, the 16L array performs best. For k-points, superior flip angle homogeneity is achieved at the expense of more power deposition, and the dipole arrays outperform the loop coil arrays.

Discussion And Conclusion: For most arrays and regular imaging, the constraint on head SAR is reached before constraints on peak local SAR are violated. Furthermore, the different drive vectors in k-points alleviate strong peaks in local SAR. Flip angle inhomogeneity can be alleviated by k-points at the expense of larger power deposition. For k-points, the dipole arrays seem to outperform loop coil arrays.

Citing Articles

3D Metamaterials Facilitate Human Cardiac MRI at 21.0 Tesla: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Nurzed B, Saha N, Millward J, Niendorf T Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(3).

PMID: 39943259 PMC: 11820977. DOI: 10.3390/s25030620.


Scaling the mountains: what lies above 7 Tesla magnetic resonance?.

Schmidt R, Kleban E, Bollmann S, Wiggins C, Niendorf T MAGMA. 2023; 36(2):151-157.

PMID: 37072540 PMC: 10140119. DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01087-x.

References
1.
He X, Erturk M, Grant A, Wu X, Lagore R, DelaBarre L . First in-vivo human imaging at 10.5T: Imaging the body at 447 MHz. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 84(1):289-303. PMC: 7083701. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28131. View

2.
Sadeghi-Tarakameh A, DelaBarre L, Lagore R, Torrado-Carvajal A, Wu X, Grant A . In vivo human head MRI at 10.5T: A radiofrequency safety study and preliminary imaging results. Magn Reson Med. 2019; 84(1):484-496. PMC: 7695227. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28093. View

3.
Meliado E, Sbrizzi A, van den Berg C, Steensma B, Luijten P, Raaijmakers A . Conditional safety margins for less conservative peak local SAR assessment: A probabilistic approach. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 84(6):3379-3395. PMC: 7540599. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28335. View

4.
Kazemivalipour E, Sadeghi-Tarakameh A, Atalar E . Eigenmode analysis of the scattering matrix for the design of MRI transmit array coils. Magn Reson Med. 2020; 85(3):1727-1741. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28533. View

5.
Le Ster C, Grant A, Van de Moortele P, Monreal-Madrigal A, Adriany G, Vignaud A . Magnetic field strength dependent SNR gain at the center of a spherical phantom and up to 11.7T. Magn Reson Med. 2022; 88(5):2131-2138. PMC: 9420790. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29391. View