» Articles » PMID: 36993150

Role of Priority Effects in Invasive Plant Species Management: Early Arrival of Native Seeds Guarantees the Containment of Invasion by Giant Ragweed

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2023 Mar 30
PMID 36993150
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Empirical evidence shows that early arrival of native species, which induces the priority effects, can contribute to invasive plant species containment. However, more systematic studies are required to test the applied relevance of the priority effect. This study therefore aimed at testing the priority effects generated by different sowing times of seeds of nine native species on one target invasive plant species, that is, Giant ragweed (). This study hypothesized that, when sown earlier, some native species will be able to substantially contain through resource preemption. An additive competition design was used to test the competitive effects of native species on . Depending on the sowing times of native and invasive plant species, three priority treatments were conducted: all species sown at the same time (T1); native species sown 3 weeks before (T2); and native species sown 6 weeks before (T3). Priority effects created by all nine native species significantly affected the invasibility of . The average value of the relative competition index (RCI) of was the highest when native seeds were sown 6 weeks early and decreased with decreasing early sowing time of native plants. The species identity effect was not significant on RCI if natives were sown at the same time or 3 weeks earlier than invasion, but it was significant ( = .0123) if they were sown 6 weeks earlier than . The findings of this study clearly show that native species, when sown early, provide strong competition and resist invasion through prior utilization of resources. The consideration of this knowledge might improve invasion management practices.

Citing Articles

Germination patterns and seedling growth of congeneric native and invasive species: Implications for risk assessment.

Kharel N, Dangol A, Shrestha A, Airi H, Devkota A, Thapa L Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(4):e11312.

PMID: 38651163 PMC: 11033625. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.11312.


Factors affecting establishment and population growth of the invasive weed .

Zhao W, Xue Z, Liu T, Wang H, Han Z Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1251441.

PMID: 37810382 PMC: 10556694. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1251441.


Role of priority effects in invasive plant species management: Early arrival of native seeds guarantees the containment of invasion by Giant ragweed.

Byun C Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(3):e9940.

PMID: 36993150 PMC: 10040727. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9940.

References
1.
Wang H, Liu T, Dong H, Zhao W, Liu X, Wang R . Changes in the composition of the soil seed bank of grassland after giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) invasion. J Environ Manage. 2022; 317:115468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115468. View

2.
Byun C, Lee E . Ecological application of biotic resistance to control the invasion of an invasive plant, . Ecol Evol. 2017; 7(7):2181-2192. PMC: 5383480. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2799. View

3.
Lindig-Cisneros R, Zedler J . Relationships between canopy complexity and germination microsites for Phalaris arundinacea L. Oecologia. 2017; 133(2):159-167. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1020-7. View

4.
Tarsa E, Holdaway B, Kettenring K . Tipping the balance: The role of seed density, abiotic filters, and priority effects in seed-based wetland restoration. Ecol Appl. 2022; 32(8):e2706. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2706. View

5.
Dong H, Song Z, Liu T, Liu Z, Liu Y, Chen B . Causes of differences in the distribution of the invasive plants and in the Yili Valley, China. Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(23):13122-13133. PMC: 7713981. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6902. View